What this guy is sayin?Did u know that he have more than 20k troops on that city
,or they havent share the forum with AG guys
Im saying that..
Hert taking a city, in the following situation:
1) on an island ringed by HERT members
2) Deep in HERT territory where they have short attack times
3) Outside of EBC territory where they have long support times
is totally different to the following situation
1) on an island ringed by EBH members
2) Deep in EBC territory where Hert have long travel times
3) Inside EBC territory where they have short support times
The conclusion that HERT taking a city deap in their own territory, means as a result they can easily take a city deap in EBC territory on a WW island is a poor conclusion to make.
Like I say, just because ive scored against an England Goalkeeper, doesnt make me good enough to play for england.
The silly thing is, most people were willing to offer HERT congratulations for participation levels, effectiveness, and taking a city, but you all went and ruined it by spouting nonsense like "if we can take a city in 35 surrounded by HERT players, we can take a WW city deep in EBC territory just as easily. "..
Apart from that, i didnt actually understand what you were saying.