Ok i think its safe to say that you guys are bringing up silly arguements here that dont need to be debated.
"Do you have a problem with under 18's "
The under 18 arguements are based on a steroetypical view on a generalisation of kids that act immaturely across the internet. The reason that under 18's has become such an issue is because people remember the arseholes and attention seekers, more than they do the other 10% of the under 18's group that actually play well and act mature. Im sure applicants under 18 that come across mature will be given a chance.
"Why is that. You'll need Humour "
Why do you generalise humour with only under 18's? iv played plenty of games over the net to know that even people at the age of 40+ can have a laugh and a good time. A sense of humour differs from person to person, not age group to age group.
"there isn't any difference between an 15 years old who know how to play and an 18 years old who also knows how to play "
Like i have stated earlier in the post, most people look at people under 18 on the internet as kids because of bad experiences with similar aged people with a total lack of maturity. He has said that people under 18 that play well and act mature will be given a chance.
"give it a shoot
How old do you think I'm and how old do you think i joined GP ? "
Frankly put i would say your under 20, because of your outrage at the issue being discussed.
At the end of the day people need to understand that they are recruiting the player more than anything else, stereo types aside, if a guy of any age spams the forum, taunts people in game for no reason and isnt a team player, they wont be a desireable applicant. Imo, that is the type of person the Original poster is trying to deter, if anything he could edit his post to make it less offensive.
But with freedom of speech and all that crap, who cares? really?
