Conquest or Revolt

[DeletedUser]

i know this is a Conquest world but what do yall prefer Revolt or Conquest worlds and why?

 

[DeletedUser]

I prefer revolt worlds because I feel they allow for a more aggressive approach, personally.

 

[DeletedUser]

Conquest. .
Because i'm lazy and stuff. Yeah.

 

[DeletedUser]

Conquest. It's the old fashioned way and it works!

 

[DeletedUser]

i think i would agree with Tafkan. revolt suits my style of play better but i really enjoy playing Tau

 

[DeletedUser17523]

Never played COnquest so vote revolt!

 

[DeletedUser]

Conquest, Because my timming sucks and i'm lazy like the doctor

 

[DeletedUser]

only played conquest, so will have to vote for it, and dont plan on trying revolt anytime soon

 

[DeletedUser]

Conquest, Because my timming sucks and i'm lazy like the doctor

Lmao!
+Rep.

Edit: I've played Revolt... it was okayish, but it makes you have to play alot more imo

 

[DeletedUser]

I havnt played revolt but from what I have heard I like conquest better, it gives you a chance to attack and support to take a city instead of just attack and seems more fun to have to time attacks and support because unlike the Doc I'm not lazy

 

[DeletedUser]

Revolt requires precise timing as well.

 

[DeletedUser]

Revolt requires precise timing as well.

Yes but just for clearing, conquest clearing and landing support against counter attacks..

 

[DeletedUser]

There is a fair bit of timing involved when defending in revolt worlds as well, though.

 

[DeletedUser]

There is a fair bit of timing involved when defending in revolt worlds as well, though.

Yes but what I mean is this...

Conquest- You support and attack to take a city, and attack and supprt to save a city...

Revolt- You can support only to save a city and attack only to capture a city, to simple in my opinion...

 

[DeletedUser]

Different strokes for different folks.

 

[DeletedUser]

Tafkanx i get the impression your a bit of a viking style player like nothing better then a quick R_PE and Pillage then off to the next city

No disrespect intended

 

[DeletedUser]

Ha... I wouldn't say that necessarily. I have been told that I have a very cautious play style, and I would probably agree with that assessment.

More than anything I think I enjoy the simplicity of revolt. You attack with offense and defend with defense (though there is some slight overlap with hybrid units).

Both styles require different tactics, and some players tend to be more suited to one over the other. Your mileage may vary.

 

[DeletedUser20429]

very true I prefer revolt as you can grow faster by taking ghost towns with out the revolt tech I have been taking ghost towns my whole time on Rho with the exception of now because I have revolt tech now

 

[DeletedUser]

I think revolt requires more of a precise timing, you have to be precise before the cs lands with your attacks otherwise all your work could end up falling and you would end up back at the drawing board. However with conquest it gives you a chance to break the conquest unlike revolt.

I reckon it is personal choice, as mentioned above there are different variables to each system but overall i prefer revolt