Swag and Steph you both hit it on the head... it's amazing how some players (not only Dark.Scorpion72) confuse "inactive" for "traitor" when they're on the losing side of ww.
you should have seen the reports bro. coordinated attacks / support etc. If La Fam/TP wouldn't had access to to info's they couldn't land the CS and defs. (not to mention that the support was sent from a long TT) because BN had a planned take over as well ...so judge for yourself / s. for me traitor and inactive has the same meaning when we are talking abt an WW city. but that wonder has gone and it doesn't matter how you win important is to win isn't it ?
Last edited by a moderator: