Archidiamedes
Phrourach
In this bombshell document obtained by Hermonassa's most reliable source for inside information, ArchiLeaks, Olympia Legacy founder (and Hermonassa's distributor of hallucinogenic Mexican food), Taco Dave, makes stunning condemnations against TD and admits to conspiring with powerful TD players to create a new alliance which would forsake the rest of TD.
While it appears Dave's taco franchises are in the process of shutting down and leaving TD starved of its staple diet, the document remains explosive in its admonishment of TD's present structure, in its devastating assessment of TD's general membership, and, most incredibly, in its admission of Machiavellian attempts on an ally to lure TD members into either a new alliance or into OL itself if TD's leaders will not agree to create a new alliance which would leave behind the "chaff," so to speak.
Although it is well worth reading in its entirety, I have highlighted certain sections for those who may be tight on time.
While it appears Dave's taco franchises are in the process of shutting down and leaving TD starved of its staple diet, the document remains explosive in its admonishment of TD's present structure, in its devastating assessment of TD's general membership, and, most incredibly, in its admission of Machiavellian attempts on an ally to lure TD members into either a new alliance or into OL itself if TD's leaders will not agree to create a new alliance which would leave behind the "chaff," so to speak.
Although it is well worth reading in its entirety, I have highlighted certain sections for those who may be tight on time.
Author said:Taco Dave 2015-01-24 02:17
I'm back.
Anyway, I have caught up on all the Skype conversations (and anybody on this leader board should really be on Skype at this point...it's free and the most useful tool out council cna utilize for planning and real time communication, works on almost every device these days, etc...).
Anyway, it seems to me that we are back to the intial hiccup with TD, namely that two of the three founders are more concerned with stats than with the practicality of a new alliance featuring our best and brightest. That is cause for concern. I will see how I can help with this, but it suggests to me that they are a little desperate at this time and dont know how to let go of the unimportant things.
I also did not appreciate TD waiting until we had committed to our attacks in "joint" OP's before then cleaning up the wreckage afterwards. My instinct would be to host separate OP's that had them striking first, then us hitting our preferred targets. Otherwise, we might as well just do our own thing anyway as far as OP's go. We certainly arent lacking in heavy hitters in OL.
As far as a merge goes, I am against OL merging into TD. The reality is that, while OL probably cant win WW's on our own, we can actually do better than TD at this point, if both alliances are still flying solo at that point. We are just better organized and far more efficient than they are.
Which brings me to another point: TD has always been in a state of internal turmoil. This is largely due to their leadership structure and the sheer amount of players they have, most of whom could be considered simmers when they arent outright inactive. They also have some playerswho, despite their large city counts, dont really understand the game at all. This causes further friction in their ranks. There is no way we want to be drawn into that. This is largely why Doc and I have insisted on a new alliance rather than a merge for some time now. Culls the ranks a bit from their end and puts US in a poition to seet up a system that prevents that sort of chaos in the future.
Ultimately, we need more players and a larger resource pool, plus an ocean buffer, to win WW's. That is what we lack. Now, if we had an ocean buffer (or a 3 ocean buffer as would really be necessary) between our enemies and our WW islands, then the reszt would be moot. We would be in a strong position to win on our own. That one thing however, by my mind, will be why we finish second if something doesnt change. However, I dont believe in letting that drive us to making a decision we will regret later.
A new allliance. I am on board with that. A merge, I am not. As always however, discussions bring new ideas and new opportunities. I will be reopening dialogue with the people I had open dialogues with before and see what there is to see.
TL : DR I know, lol.
quoteeditdelete
Taco Dave 2015-01-24 05:56
Alright, each of you should have a copy of my message to TD's council now. You guys should know as an addendum to that message that, should TD's council decide not to accept the terms laid out (which is the formation of a new alliance), then several of their largest members will be leaving TD to join us anyway. They see the practical nature of this, and if the rest of their peeps dont, then they would rather finish out the world with us.
Anyway, discuss please.
Last edited: