well, neither barry69 nor paul grady are in the top-24 attack bp.
So the list really should be from these players:
1 dysen Eaters of the Dead 809503
2 SparkySte The Huns 668495
3 Vigoran Eaters of the Dead 603327
4 varga Black 515564
5 umdupas2 Disciples of Ares 445928
6 raysor Sons of Hercules 443315
7 Dawgski Disciples of Ares 435180
8 TicTac Eaters of the Dead 418371
9 greco1313 The Huns 383023
10 Kristopoulos Disciples of Ares 371358
11 G.R.O.M Disciples of Ares 349387
12 nwinder SG-Elites 344303
13 vernizzle The Huns 335443
14 DonisG The Huns 332342
15 Thessalos Sons of Hercules 328078
16 Trevor Mincher Disciples of Ares 324935
17 tarzar Sons of Hercules 324728
18 Cronos90 Initiates of Ares 324353
19 Petronious Harbingers 323938
20 martinbm31 Eaters of the Dead 321525
21 peterighthere Disciples of Ares 317463
22 vengence1 Ionian Legions 314319
23 Jsouthern The Huns 308737
24 Dingy The Huns 306795
In a fairly normal post for me i would like to challenge your logic that the highest 24 apb are the best...
if you take a look at this link
http://www.grepostats.com/world/en4/player/270416/colonizations
nwinder has conquored 5 enemy players on the huns side. (they were all inactives but we will ignore this for now)
compared to my own stats
http://www.grepostats.com/world/en4/player/214771/colonizations?page=0 Of which i have conquored 36 enemy cities.
Now how do we determine which players are the better players? It is true, Nwinder has more ABP than i do, however i have more BP in total, because almost all of my conquests have been attacked as they are on large enemy players.
So does it come down to, as Nwinder suggested, ABP, or a players total contribution to their alliance.