Who set the alliance Cap?

DeletedUser

Guest
Did no one learn from this?:
Iota ranks

1 LEGION 4092455 60 68208
2 LEGION II 3364899 60 56082
3 LEGION I I I 1638470 59 27771

This will be the exact same on this world and why? cause the cap is lower than Iota's which means more branches and more chance of the alliances without those branches having no chance
 

DeletedUser6983

Guest
ya. but it makes it harder for communication. I like around 75-100. but i think 50 would be alrite. A lil low. but i can live
 

DeletedUser2663

Guest
123KOAN said:
ya. but it makes it harder for communication. I like around 75-100. but i think 50 would be alrite. A lil low. but i can live
Click to expand...

not really with shared fourms. all the legion alliances have the exact same fourms. not one thing is different.
 

DeletedUser6983

Guest
O, then that changes it. But o well. just cream them MRA's here
 

DeletedUser

Guest
sparkz104 said:
Did no one learn from this?:
Iota ranks

1 LEGION 4092455 60 68208
2 LEGION II 3364899 60 56082
3 LEGION I I I 1638470 59 27771

This will be the exact same on this world and why? cause the cap is lower than Iota's which means more branches and more chance of the alliances without those branches having no chance
Click to expand...

Don't fear, I am here.
 

DeletedUser2663

Guest
Benvolio said:
And they are allied with like the entire leaderboard, right?
Click to expand...

except for Kotor i believe. i think there is some skirmishs there but from what i have heard my farming for bp on gamma would be more of a war than that
 

DeletedUser909

Guest
In my opinion, a lower alliance cap would make for a more strategic game. I might be wrong, but we'll see. Maybe the next world will have a cap of 500 again.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Betsy said:
In my opinion, a lower alliance cap would make for a more strategic game. I might be wrong, but we'll see. Maybe the next world will have a cap of 500 again.
Click to expand...

I can agree with that. May we see an alliance cap of 20 some time soon? I'm sure that will bring out the elites. Like W34 of TW, just on Grepo?
 

DeletedUser12512

Guest
The smaller the cap the better as far as I am concerned, think of all the targets out there if you don't start letting in small point players just because you have some misguided sense of morality or conscience...

50 players is more than enough to win any war I have ever seen if they are 80% active, 500 player caps is just a waste of time, every elite player joins together to kill the newbs' and then the server is all downhill from there, but if you force them to take different sides, I am all for that.

Any chance you can take out the ability to ally, NAP and have shared forums? Now that would make it interresting. Communication between different 'nations' shouldnt be so easy.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Atticus X said:
The smaller the cap the better as far as I am concerned, think of all the targets out there if you don't start letting in small point players just because you have some misguided sense of morality or conscience...

50 players is more than enough to win any war I have ever seen if they are 80% active, 500 player caps is just a waste of time, every elite player joins together to kill the newbs' and then the server is all downhill from there, but if you force them to take different sides, I am all for that.

Any chance you can take out the ability to ally, NAP and have shared forums? Now that would make it interresting. Communication between different 'nations' shouldnt be so easy.
Click to expand...

im just totally agree.

Betsy said:
In my opinion, a lower alliance cap would make for a more strategic game. I might be wrong, but we'll see. Maybe the next world will have a cap of 500 again.
Click to expand...

is no use,coz they will make 10 academies and its 500 cap again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top