DeletedUser41523
Guest
This is stemming off of the best team ever assembled topic. I noticed a lot of people offering up teams that many agree are good but they also only play worlds deemed undesirable with questionable competition. This brings me to my question on if world difficulty is important in the matter of respect?
Like is it better to be the team that dominated a speed 1 morale world in wars and swept wonders? Or the team that had a good run in a speed 3 but barely won wonders, never crowned, and was deadlocked or even losing on a front or two?
Like is it better to be the team that dominated a speed 1 morale world in wars and swept wonders? Or the team that had a good run in a speed 3 but barely won wonders, never crowned, and was deadlocked or even losing on a front or two?