DeletedUser
Guest
and add to that the 3 extra cities we took from them yesterday but i suppose its got to wait until the next update.
Its not worth complaining about. If a player ghosts, he just gives you free cities.
Stats... I don't care if they count or not. Not worth fighting over. If NWO needs to buff their stats with Ghost Towns, fine. I'll give them that handicap.
From what I have seen, TL/TV care more about stats (excluding igapolis and maybe a few others) than NWO.
Although raw numbers give a good idea of how the war is going, I prefer to see figures summarizing the stats. Here, I offer a plot of cumulative conquests per week. First day of the war was set to 17/07/2011 as that was the day in which first conquests occurred.
The plot clearly shows everything that has been previously discussed in this forum. During the first week, at the start of the war, both TL and TV pounded NWO with 34 and 31 conquests while losing only 12 and 1, respectively. However, after that, both sides have been basically exchanging cities as can be inferred by the very similar trends of conquest. The slope of these lines shows that TL and TV are respectively taking 4.8 and 7.7 NWO cities per week. NWO, on the other hand is giving a good fight by making 5.4 take overs per week to TL. If any, NWO is lagging in the war against TV with clear lower rates of conquest per week. Of course, it is too early to make a safe assumption of what side is winning.
I intend to update this every now and then.
Raulm
Although raw numbers give a good idea of how the war is going, I prefer to see figures summarizing the stats. Here, I offer a plot of cumulative conquests per week. First day of the war was set to 17/07/2011 as that was the day in which first conquests occurred.
The plot clearly shows everything that has been previously discussed in this forum. During the first week, at the start of the war, both TL and TV pounded NWO with 34 and 31 conquests while losing only 12 and 1, respectively. However, after that, both sides have been basically exchanging cities as can be inferred by the very similar trends of conquest. The slope of these lines shows that TL and TV are respectively taking 4.8 and 7.7 NWO cities per week. NWO, on the other hand is giving a good fight by making 5.4 take overs per week to TL. If any, NWO is lagging in the war against TV with clear lower rates of conquest per week. Of course, it is too early to make a safe assumption of what side is winning.
I intend to update this every now and then.
Raulm
Although raw numbers give a good idea of how the war is going, I prefer to see figures summarizing the stats. Here, I offer a plot of cumulative conquests per week. First day of the war was set to 17/07/2011 as that was the day in which first conquests occurred.
The plot clearly shows everything that has been previously discussed in this forum. During the first week, at the start of the war, both TL and TV pounded NWO with 34 and 31 conquests while losing only 12 and 1, respectively. However, after that, both sides have been basically exchanging cities as can be inferred by the very similar trends of conquest. The slope of these lines shows that TL and TV are respectively taking 4.8 and 7.7 NWO cities per week. NWO, on the other hand is giving a good fight by making 5.4 take overs per week to TL. If any, NWO is lagging in the war against TV with clear lower rates of conquest per week. Of course, it is too early to make a safe assumption of what side is winning.
I intend to update this every now and then.
Raulm
What program did you use to make this?
Total:
TL/V = 100
NWO = 50
To put it in perspective.......
P.S. We kicked out our in-actives (thus the drop in points) so you probably won't be able to take many cities anymore. I will give you credit for Rylet, all his cities are on the frontline so he is getting pounded.
__________________
Looking to lose your cities so your "leaders" can grow? Join NWO (it rhymes)
It's no way to discuss against hard figures TL/V = 100; NWO = 50. We can read that in the whole war we have lost twice as many cities as we have gained. My point with the statistical analysis of the data is to show the current trend without considering if the conquests were to actives of inactives.
Twist the stats around anyway you'd like, show them on graphs charting weekly changes in whatever makes you feel good. Point is, we are beating you 2 - 1. I'd also like to point out that our gains are IN ADDITION to cities we are taking from JFL, a war that was already in progress when you decided to jump in. We are fighting a 3 front war while you only have one enemy. Put that on a graph.....
During that same time frame:
TL = 32
JFL = 7
If anybody is bored, perhaps create a breakdown of the number of players per alliance that are actually taking/losing cities - it will be a good indicator of the proportion of an alliance that are actively involved in fighting.
P.S. We kicked out our in-actives (thus the drop in points)
i would publicly commend you on the graph.Just a little, very tiny, correction... Unless TL and TV are actually an academy of each other, NWO is actually fighting 2 fronts. Maybe i missed something but I thought that both alliances were grown up alliances, otherwise you may notify Kas1 so he makes the corresponding change.