DeletedUser
Guest
Show proof.
And there's no real competition for the alliance ones at the moment
And yet Nordic Nightmares, the alliance of 'big' players, is losing their war against lower ranked players in MoRC by 38 to 15 conquests.
It seems NN have the strongest individuals, but MoRC is the better alliance !
View attachment 4467
I can agree with this, did not factor cities per player/cities per allianceHi wabberjack,
I think I see the point you are making (ie. you suggest NN are better because they make more Conquests per player), however I don't think it's valid. Its a lot easier for a big player to make a conquest over a smaller player, because they have a lot more assets to play with and its easier to coordinate them.
I wouldn't expect someone with 10 cities to make as many conquests against a 30 city player, as a 30 city player would make against a 10 city player !? (which is effectively what your 'conquests per player' measure is suggesting).
I think a fairer measure (to both sides) is the ratio of conquests to the number of cities available to make the conquests (because number of cities is a better measure of potential military force, than number of players is).
This gives:
- MoRC 38 for 1645 alliance cities = 2.31%
- NN 15 for 1499 alliance cities = 1.00%
View attachment 4470
nah, maybe a milestone for using the most gold in a game?Hmm there should be a milestone for the most looters of the day, LumberKing20 would win hands down
Idk who would "win" that one, if you could call it thatnah, maybe a milestone for using the most gold in a game?