DeletedUser
Guest
Change is only good when it makes things better. i say no to 2.0
DeletedUser
Guest
are u telling that to us?
DeletedUser
Guest
It was told to a deleted post.
DeletedUser
Guest
Where is that post?
DeletedUser
Guest
DeletedUser5398
Guest
change for the sake of change
by this logic, i need to quit my job and leave my wife as it has been a while of the same thing and i need to spice things up and make it different in order to keep it exciting.
however if i already currently enjoy my job and my marriage is it necessary for me to start working in another place that i have already been to and not enjoy, or to start dating that girl from high school, who although she 'looked' pretty, the personal interchanges we had were very uncomfortable...
not sure if these analogies are silly and not relevant when speaking about a game but then wait...we are speaking about a game.
time to think up new ways to play chess so it doesn't get so boring, yawn.
VB
by this logic, i need to quit my job and leave my wife as it has been a while of the same thing and i need to spice things up and make it different in order to keep it exciting.
however if i already currently enjoy my job and my marriage is it necessary for me to start working in another place that i have already been to and not enjoy, or to start dating that girl from high school, who although she 'looked' pretty, the personal interchanges we had were very uncomfortable...
not sure if these analogies are silly and not relevant when speaking about a game but then wait...we are speaking about a game.
time to think up new ways to play chess so it doesn't get so boring, yawn.
VB
DeletedUser3613
Guest
LOL VB that would be the case if your job was going to leave you in an undecorated office for ever and your wife was just gona sit around doing nothing for the foorseeable future then one day breaking 
It isnt change for changeing sake it is moving forward with grepolis and playing on the version that will be updated and will have dedicated bug hunters, imagine how the bug tabs will look for 1.26 in a years time with no upgrades and lack of investment *sad face*
It isnt change for changeing sake it is moving forward with grepolis and playing on the version that will be updated and will have dedicated bug hunters, imagine how the bug tabs will look for 1.26 in a years time with no upgrades and lack of investment *sad face*
DeletedUser
Guest
LOL VB that would be the case if your job was going to leave you in an undecorated office for ever and your wife was just gona sit around doing nothing for the foorseeable future then one day breaking
It isnt change for changeing sake it is moving forward with grepolis and playing on the version that will be updated and will have dedicated bug hunters, imagine how the bug tabs will look for 1.26 in a years time with no upgrades and lack of investment *sad face*
I don't like 2.0 but I agree with what dazlerr says on this (all poor analogy's though!). Eventually they will drop the support for 1.26, look at Halloween for an example. They won't be able to afford to support 2 versions of the one game.
DeletedUser7213
Guest
What? With all the money they make from exploiting 2.0 players? 20 gold for troop cut down, lol. Whatever next?
DeletedUser
Guest
yes in V2, the person with the biggest pocket wins, in V1 it isn't like that
daz, you have a big pocket but not all
daz, you have a big pocket but not all
DeletedUser3613
Guest
But 2.0 has .........
DeletedUser5398
Guest
and with that i ask all those who think switching to 2.0 will be awesome... share your reasons.
DeletedUser
Guest
I disagree with you entirely Daz.
If you like 2.0, I think you should join a 2.0 world. The majority of active forumers of the externals, and in the internal alliance forum are against this update.
This is about profit. Running 2 versions is more costly than 1.
If you like 2.0, I think you should join a 2.0 world. The majority of active forumers of the externals, and in the internal alliance forum are against this update.
This is about profit. Running 2 versions is more costly than 1.
DeletedUser
Guest
Maybe it's not as much about having the 2.0 as it is about not wanting to be left to degrade.
1.26, just like any other game server needs maintenance. Now, whether we like it or not the developers have decided they don't want to spend a single dime anymore on 1.26.
If they can get rid of 1.26, it's best for them and if they ahve to keep it because the players don't want, they will still pull out all the support and staff.
What does that mean?
it is the same as the houses. The weather, the animals, the people who use it destroy the building every day, little by little. The water pipe get blocked, the electric wires become old and create shortcuts. the roof, the stairs, the porch etc...you get the picture.
If you don't fix those things, the house will be not liveable.
The same thing will happen to 1.26 worlds. You will see game lags, bugs, page loading errors and eventually we will leave the server one by one.
So, as i said. It's not about whether we like 2.0 more than 1.26. But i can like 2.0 more than a non-working 1.26
1.26, just like any other game server needs maintenance. Now, whether we like it or not the developers have decided they don't want to spend a single dime anymore on 1.26.
If they can get rid of 1.26, it's best for them and if they ahve to keep it because the players don't want, they will still pull out all the support and staff.
What does that mean?
it is the same as the houses. The weather, the animals, the people who use it destroy the building every day, little by little. The water pipe get blocked, the electric wires become old and create shortcuts. the roof, the stairs, the porch etc...you get the picture.
If you don't fix those things, the house will be not liveable.
The same thing will happen to 1.26 worlds. You will see game lags, bugs, page loading errors and eventually we will leave the server one by one.
So, as i said. It's not about whether we like 2.0 more than 1.26. But i can like 2.0 more than a non-working 1.26
DeletedUser3613
Guest
^^ what klev said.
I couldnt explain it better myself, we either vote to upgrade or vote no and rot.
I couldnt explain it better myself, we either vote to upgrade or vote no and rot.
DeletedUser
Guest
vote no and rot is better
we are customers so we have right to speak up
GH have 4 cores ATM, they can build their wonders in a corner and they can win easily
think about everything mate
DeletedUser
Guest
I am with Daz on this, I see it from the other side and time and effort is needed to keep any web/cloud service up and running.
From what I have seen in business and the wording of the survay it is not implied that the vote will be the final call, from experience things like this in business are just one aspect of the decision making process.
I have seen various points brought up about not wanting to go to version two, however I have yet seen one that provides any real substance.
All other games/web/cloud services make you go with the update, paying or not. You just look at Xbox Dashboard, Age of Empires Online, MS Online Service, Facebook, twitter the BBC website... (I could go on)
Innogames may have been slow off the mark upgrading but if we look out the outside world it is how it will go forward.
In my home and work life I use an awful lot of online services and not once have I had the chance to stay with the old version, I have to move forward while I don’t always like the updates I have to embrace them and go with them, if not I can’t use the software.
From what I have seen in business and the wording of the survay it is not implied that the vote will be the final call, from experience things like this in business are just one aspect of the decision making process.
I have seen various points brought up about not wanting to go to version two, however I have yet seen one that provides any real substance.
All other games/web/cloud services make you go with the update, paying or not. You just look at Xbox Dashboard, Age of Empires Online, MS Online Service, Facebook, twitter the BBC website... (I could go on)
Innogames may have been slow off the mark upgrading but if we look out the outside world it is how it will go forward.
In my home and work life I use an awful lot of online services and not once have I had the chance to stay with the old version, I have to move forward while I don’t always like the updates I have to embrace them and go with them, if not I can’t use the software.
DeletedUser
Guest
GH will win easily if V2 comes, they control more cores and they would build in the middle of their empire which makes it impossible to defeat them
If V2 comes to gamma, agility is very important
If V2 comes to gamma, agility is very important
DeletedUser
Guest
One of your stupidest posts yet arul.
If you're going to vote no just because you think you'll lose, you shouldn't vote. The game is meant to be played competitively and you have to strive to a be better than the so-called best. I would rather attempt a CS on a 2 million player and not get it than give up before I attempt it.
Also, 4 cores? I see two max and that has nothing with building wonders.
To build wonders, an island must have all slots filled by one alliance. I'm pretty sure Fusion and GH have an equal amount of islands like this, more or less. Either way, you only really need 4.
DeletedUser
Guest
yes in V2, the person with the biggest pocket wins, in V1 it isn't like that
daz, you have a big pocket but not all
I don't have money, i don't use premium, all i have is time to play the game, but i am still winning 2.0...