Secondly, what?
Crime rates are at the lowest in history, and they are even lower in secular states with high atheist populations. You can't make claims like that without backing them up.
This is true. Scientists are people though and science is not. When I finish uni I'll be a scientist, doesn't mean what I believe has any basis if I don't proof it. No religion has any scientific footing and I don't see that changing anytime soon. You can believe whatever you want as long as you don't try to make it more than it is, a belief.
The Bible conflicts with the bible. Even disregarding that, the bible is a work of fiction and should not be seen as more, most christians even agree with that. Fundamentalism is oudated, get with the times.
Does crime rate necessarily matter? I mean the crime rate can only account crimes that are reported, couldn't it just be that less crimes are reported? Hypothetically speaking I can also that less crime doesn't matter, as maybe these are more severe crimes that hurt more people, like say terrorism which has been on the rise since 1995 when that graph was originally made. This is not my view on the crime rate, but it can kind of serve as a counterargument to the crime thing.
As for the bible contradicting itself, well it really comes down to reading comprehension. For people to say it conflicts, and have never actually held a bible or read one makes it hypocritical. It was a pic and it has a lot of questions and references about the bible. I skimmed through and immediately saw that #105 reads "How did David kill Goliath?"
Here are the bible verses it references "49 David put his hand into the bag and took out a stone, hurled it with the sling, and struck the Philistine on the head. The stone embedded itself in his brow and he feel prostrate on the ground."
Ok so in the first sentence, David is acting like a grepo slinger and hurls a stone with a sling. It hits Goliath and he falls face first into the ground.
Next line: "50 Thus David overcame the Philistine with sling and stone; he struck the Philistine mortally, and did it without a sword."
Ok so this is basically praising David for being successful in a 1 on 1 against a great warrior, Goliath, who had defeated the best from the opposition.
Last Line and the one that contradicts supposedly: "51 Then David ran and stood over him; with the Philistine's own sword [which he drew from its sheath] he dispatched him and cut off his head."
Goliath is still lying face first in the ground, and David uses Goliath's sword to behead him.
^I fail to see what the atheist who made this found contradicting, that was pretty straight forward English.
I also looked at #100 which asked if God would curse the Earth. Then the bible reference it gave doesn't exist, there is no chapter 4 of Malachi. In Genesis 8:21 it says that God will never punish people again as we are naturally imperfect. So the contradiction just isn't there.
After looking at two of the ones that caught my eye while skimming, and seeing that both are incorrect, I would like to question the credibility of the source
I can agree that some of the stories are fictional, that is pretty obvious. It isn't a history book, it is a book about morals and how they derive from God. To call it fiction is probably not right either, as it is a series of stories made by many different authors. There are historical figures in the Bible, along with some facts on what they did and how they lived.