pnp TU/AAB vs BS/RS.

[DeletedUser]

OK since our enemies have decided to fight (at long last, yawn) I thought our little war deserved its own thread. As most of you know from post in other threads The Unit declared war against Black Sea a couple of weeks back. Shortly there after REPUBLIKA SRPSKA joined BS in the war against us.

RS seem to be a funny sort, their alliance profile says that their brother alliance is Legends who are currently under attack from BS but yet they fight along side BS. I have seem some funny diplomacy in this game but that one has me confused. However after RS declared war on us As Athens Burns joined our side and we have had it pretty much our own way so far.

We have taken many BS/RS targets in ocean 65 and have moved in to the east of ocean 55. BS have a couple of big cities left in our ocean and one of them ioan.voicu who lost two big cities to us actually started a revolt in one of our cities today. We are still waiting on the result of that but big respect goes to ioan for having the bottle to fight on after losing so much.

RS like to help our cause by sending attacks with no ls escort and land attacks full of archers and swords (got to love them newbies) and seem to have little coordinating. BS as you all know can stack cities like no alliance I have ever seen but we are breaking them down with good team work. A part from ioan and a few noob attacks from RS we haven't seen much from them. Hopefully that will change over the next little while as moto promised me fireworks and if I don't get them I will no longer be his friend

As I said we have a revolt ongoing and we have a few attacks heading their way so I will keep you up to date on how these attacks turn out.

 

[DeletedUser]

This is not much of a PnP but whatever helps to revive these forums is good for me, so +rep

 

[DeletedUser]

Its a work in progress mate they only started fighting back yesterday but I'll add to it when something interesting happens.

 

[DeletedUser]

Good, will be waiting for updates

 

[DeletedUser]

Here's a picture for you

 

[DeletedUser]

when was that picture taking? autum 1890?

Look something more recent

06. LAGASH 4,016 zenagenda istydes The Unit BLACK SEA. 2011-04-12 18:11:01

and with this conquest Kronos is saved. so you guys can forghet about any plans there


And congratulation for The Unit, after 2 or it was 3 monts they finaly could get the city that was in the middle of O65:

Pluto 4,896 yoyodan1 Archlightz .BLACK SEA. The Unit 2011-04-13 01:48:0

You should be proud now, after all those faild atempts

 

[DeletedUser]

You conquer an inactive, and then come to brag about it on the forums?


Wow

 

[DeletedUser]

this coming from sombody sho is bragging about a conquest made ages ago

And as your lider sayed, if he is inactiv and it is in your alliance, you must defend it

Btw do you know something about strategic position?

 

[DeletedUser]

Moto I had hoped we could keep this thread respectful and use it to keep players informed of what I hope to be a long and bloody war. However you carry on with your almost child like behaviour. Now I feel I must clear your "BS" up again, firstly yes I do often say if a player is inactive its up to the alliance to protect their cities until they can conquer them. As we took 4 of zen's 5 cities plus another few inactive cities I think we are doing just that. Congrats on taking one of them though it truly shows you are a great leader and an alliance to be feared

As for the city in the middle of our ocean that took so long to take in case you hadn't noticed we were a little busy taking your cities along the border. Which leads me nicely to my next point, strategic positioning? Are you for real? Have you even check where your enemy is positioned on the map? My self praising friend our alliance is built on strategic positioning. I hope you don't mind me saying but when you say things like that makes you look a little silly and takes away from your earlier glory of conquering 1 out of 5 inactive cities

 

[DeletedUser15275]

ok i'm confused, The Unit is allied with AAB but the grepostats say that AAB are conquering TU cities. please clarify. or am i missing something?

 

[DeletedUser]

We have an agreement with AAB that allows both of us to conquer each others inactive cities. Better our allies take them than our enemies.

 

[DeletedUser]

As long as BS don't get them

 

[DeletedUser]

Moto I had hoped we could keep this thread respectful and use it to keep players informed of what I hope to be a long and bloody war. However you carry on with your almost child like behaviour. Now I feel I must clear your "BS" up again, firstly yes I do often say if a player is inactive its up to the alliance to protect their cities until they can conquer them. As we took 4 of zen's 5 cities plus another few inactive cities I think we are doing just that. Congrats on taking one of them though it truly shows you are a great leader and an alliance to be feared

As for the city in the middle of our ocean that took so long to take in case you hadn't noticed we were a little busy taking your cities along the border. Which leads me nicely to my next point, strategic positioning? Are you for real? Have you even check where your enemy is positioned on the map? My self praising friend our alliance is built on strategic positioning. I hope you don't mind me saying but when you say things like that makes you look a little silly and takes away from your earlier glory of conquering 1 out of 5 inactive cities

Are you crazy? I am acting like a child? look at your boy EbcKyle, and then talk about me.

And I am pleased to see you always get escuses when it comes about your alliance.

This will be a blody war, but it will not finish how you want.
We send suport from 13-18h for our players, and you brag about taking theyr citys? Even if you took theyr citys, the players that matter alredy moved to our see and keeped the culture. Ioan is safe, Kronos is safe, they will remain to 55 to expand back in 65. And we will take one island by one when we will finaly move closer

 

[DeletedUser]

Kronos isn't too safe seeing as how we conquered his top city last night

 

[DeletedUser]

Kronos isn't too safe seeing as how we conquered his top city last night

you conquered it this morning actualy, to bad we wore at sleep and could't send defence in time. but we will take it back soon

 

[DeletedUser]

How do you plan to take any cities if you're turtling all the time?

 

[DeletedUser]

 

[DeletedUser]

And I am pleased to see you always get escuses when it comes about your alliance.

Don't worry all the players in 65 that you conquerd so far wore inexperienced players.

you conquered it this morning actualy, to bad we wore at sleep and could't send defence in time. but we will take it back soon

Indeed I do seem to be the one who is always got an excuse I would also like to gain some prospective on this issue of how your poor alliance is so heavily out numbered. This is a map of the ocean 55/65 border as it is clear to see you have a hell of a lot of cities right next to us. Though I am sure all these players are inexperienced or inactive right?

 

[DeletedUser]

we just started this push man, so we know we can't do wonders in a day

Our goal was to save kronos and ioan not to lose they BP, and we did, so we are pleased with that. Now we do not even care about Ioan's position, as you can see it is hurd to defend, but he did manege to make 2 citys in 55.

 

[DeletedUser]

Excellent you know having ioan build cities up for us time and time again is a real time saver. Now I know he has done so much for us already and I don't mean to sound ungrateful but could you ask him if its not too much trouble will he spend a little more time focusing on troops this time. With the low BP we are getting from him its hard to keep the CP up to actually have the means to take his cities.

As for only starting your push didn't you say a week ago in another thread we were going to lose a lot of cities in the next week? Maths were never my strong point but it wouldn't take a master mind to add up how many we have lost.