Kreger, the answer is a resounding yes, I think that I have done the right thing, you are a refugee now, the same thing that started the war between us. The whole thing has come full circle on you as things tend to do.
There are always choices to be made and the leader of an alliance has the choice to accept members or deny them. When a leader is informed of refugee's they have all the facts and they have a choice to keep or kick those refugee's. The choice to fight for them is made by the leader and not forced on them by anyone.
In fact it is the refugee that is the root cause of the problem nearly every time. They run and hide when the going gets tough in the hope that they will be safe and recieve protection from the alliance where they are hiding. As seen by the refugee's LoE took in from PUU which caused the war in the first place and resulted in the downfall of LoE.
The one thing I do is to put the good of my alliance above myself and I think that I have some forsight and ability or we wouldn't be seeing LoE dead right now, now would we? I think that your previous posts here nearly all say that you will be the winners in the long run, LoE will outlast TBS, not quite reality is it? So I think that I have a better grasp on tactical ability, seeing the bigger picture and above all longevity, don't you you think?
My alliance play as a team, we fight as a team and we support each other as a team. The building of a team that works is a sign of a good leader I believe and having members who actually contribute to the alliance helps a great deal.
What you have now is not a great alliance being made even better, you have a great alliance accepting simmers, inactives, grey flag takers, hide in vm's and a few good players. So far from creating a greater force you will be making cj weaker in the long run with the liability you bring to them!
And I don't believe that I have spoken to anyone in LoE with regard to them leaving LoE, so you are wrong in that, again and as usual. I posted in here that they could contact me if they wanted out and no one responded. That to me just says that no one wanted out of the war, they were happy getting attacked and losing cities, go figure that one. So, unless you can pull a rabbit out of your hat and post a message between myself and anyone in LoE it's a lie. Can you produce a message? or will you just ignore this?
The discussion was started by you about being a leader I think and within 1 day you disband your alliance and merge into another one where you won't be the leader, so how can you compare us when you are only a day in that position? What I think is that you have delusions of grandier, much like you did during the negotiations. Now if you want to compare any more details of our leadership accomplishments I would be more than happy to post mine up and yours for comparision.
One last point, I do like the subtle way you try and intimidate me with the use of CJ's name, you are not even a member and you use thier name freely, as if you had been a member of them forever, as a thinly vailed threat. You should have realised by now that I just laugh at threats you make, the digs you take and the words you write because I know what the truth is.
Shall I tell you what I think, I think CJ will realise thier mistake soon enough. They are far too busy fighting others elsewhere to be offering support of any kind to ex-loe members and they will realise that there are only so many fronts you can fight on and fighting on 4 fronts always ends in disaster.
