DeletedUser19042
Guest
the group called "forum army"
which you are a part of *facepalm*
are they would you say, on friendly terms with the non mod army?
I dunno, I joined fo' de cookies. Them told mi there wuld b cookies.
the group called "forum army"
which you are a part of *facepalm*
are they would you say, on friendly terms with the non mod army?
thank God
on second thought i produce this evidence.
The Killing Joke - Yesterday, 22:22
Hello everyone, after we get to a more decent size, then we can start operating against the Pro/Non mods. As for now, just do whatever I guess.
Xtcmax
Xtcmax - Yesterday, 22:24
what do we do here?
The Killing Joke
The Killing Joke - Yesterday, 22:33
That is what I am thinking over. If I want to topple the non mods, then I will need the pro mods to struck at them first(vice versa). So basically spam the spammers.
and i waive my right to more witnesses
*coughs* i hoped you would oh idk answer the questions?Yo wut m8?
U woke le mi up 'nd den dismiss le me?
Com' 1vs1 and I'll rek u.
*coughs* i hoped you would oh idk answer the questions?
you can be part of the jury if you want.
i asked the same question 2 times i guessu asked mi won questione. Y U NO LIKE ME? Cuz I iz no good english?
(I am really enjoying this)
the defense produces this evidence against the charge of conspiring with the pro-mods. If he was doing as charged with than why would my client speak of operations against the pro-mods?The Killing Joke said:Hello everyone, after we get to a more decent size, then we can start operating against the Pro/Non mods. As for now, just do whatever I guess.
I would like to set charges against chalna if he proceeds with this madness. This is an unfair case due to the fact the chalna, is also apart of the Forum Army, therefore spying for this Nons group. I have done nothing wrong so far....So I demand that we get a new prosecutor.
if you cant see any of these deals how do you expect me to consider your evidence valid to the charges?this was before the backroom deals (of which we can't see anything) that produced the obvious collaboration.
this was before the backroom deals (of which we can't see anything) that produced the obvious collaboration.
i know of the results, and my informants know of everything.