DeletedUser16429
Guest
I once built 72 cats in a city for a cat nuke
Poor me, that was back in Alpha though...
Poor me, that was back in Alpha though...
hahaha. I know I have been gone awhile, but what possible reason could someone have for building 35 cats in a city. A bit overkill no? 10 or so will take down most walls pretty decently.
erm wrong about what exactly? so your response to me posting reports contrary to evilkings statements is "WRONG!" That makes a lot of sense. You must be misty.
Looks less like facts, more like a recruitment advertising to me about this particular alliance. Oh, its your alliance.4) BZC. Like every server BZC is a small premade with players who know each other for years. on the last 2 servers is trying to add new blood in order to go for something bigger. Winning all the fights but in order to go for ww, which is not yet determined, needs more members. Swim
Looks less like facts, more like a recruitment advertising to me about this particular alliance. Oh, its your alliance.
N.B: I like the overall post, but try and be a third-person writer about your own alliance even. Or just avoid your alliance lol.
I guess my previous alliance also got disbanded due to this same reason, although on the other part of the world.i hoped that some of the ex ibwg members will join after their alliance collapsed, but they prefered zfg. time will show if their decision was right or not.
multiaccount and bots, give you advantage over your opponents. they should treated severely. but to be treated so strict for verbal reasons especially if you dont have the habbit to insult every player on server, i think should be treated with leniency. a 5 day non attackable is a fair penalty. but even 1h attackble is a problemi agree with you,
multiaccounting should not be considered for ban, now a days people do share wifi net and even share lappy with friends.
daily basis multiaccounting should be given warning.
for abuse or use of wrong word grepolis team should file a registered complaint if the same member continuously abuse, then action should be taken.
please understand in gamer world it is just one game and the one u r banning is u r customer.
That's cute GS can't beat them in game so do your best to provoke them. The you can just about take some cities
I mean...its not our fault that he failed to follow the rules of the game to which he consented when he registered an account on the game. Just like its not our fault that two days beforehand Stone Gnome also broke the rules of the game by using an illegal bot and was banned.
We all know what the rules of the game are...some of us follow those rules and some of us do not. Failure to follow those rules have consequences.
Loving the hypocrisy buddy two words for you buddy "exit" and "teamviewer".
Bb let's be honest if you're saying that isn't a commonly accepted tactic I'm calling bull. Also sniping cs timed to VM is easy as has been shown by many decent players before. Of course if you decide to hit VM and not be around when it activates well then you're not very bright. Admittedly I'd like to see a rule change that you can attack cities under siege in VM but that's just me.