DeletedUser
Guest
You are a sexist Ezy,stop pretending.
Ssshhh ajit, lol.
The ladies will stop liking me if they find out.
You are a sexist Ezy,stop pretending.
Every time i see Sandip81 name i read the D as a T lol and the P aswell...and that number 81 is a hughe shahah
Every time i see Sandip81 name i read the D as a T lol and the P aswell...and that number 81 is a hughe s
Big picture Monks are currently being used as food for every major alliance on the server and are pretty useless at defending themselves against the odds facing them. Blaze should have stayed true and allowed their cities to be taken by hostile alliances instead of his own members?? That would have been the dumb move.
They asked monks to join them, or die. But only the best players, yet when we said no they are willing to take in the ones who run screaming from a fight??? Seems like a weird tactic.
Monks are being attacked by alliances who were told no to their stand over tactics. They asked monks to join them, or die. But only the best players, yet when we said no they are willing to take in the ones who run screaming from a fight??? Seems like a weird tactic.
Im not exactly sure your definition of useless as one monk player gained a heck of a lot of BP after numerous failed attempts at taking one of his cities (including a CS sent to hit before RR started), then when the army was finally able to take it, its because we decided they could take it.
Our active players have fought well and hard to keep their cities and id say are doing pretty well. I alone have survived 5 CS attempts over the last three days by alpha and the armies (who apparently arent working together but targeting the same cities suspiciously?)
And as the pact we had with alpha was a defensive pact, had alpha done their part and helped us AT all instead of just letting us support their cities, monks may have kept some of the cities they wanted to keep away from their enemies and would have made our pact and their alliance stronger....
Historically the monks stay off these forums as there is no real point to them except big talk but i couldnt let this comment pass by.
Blaze.. How many cities have I taken off you? And how many have you taken off me? Think the score is 10-0 to me.. You couldn't rim a tyre.. I'm not crying you mug. Why would I? No, I'm just telling the lad here what to expect from you and any alliance tou are in charge of.
I am nice to folks. If you didn't go out of your way to pick an argument with me on everything I say I'd be nice to you too, but you do so I won't bother. As far as Blaze and co are concerned I don't need to speak to anyone.. I spent enough time in Nicaea both with and against them. When I came here I offered the olive branch as I believe other worlds belong there but got it thrown back in my face. They are still crying about losing to us.
Monks are being attacked by alliances who were told no to their stand over tactics. They asked monks to join them, or die. But only the best players, yet when we said no they are willing to take in the ones who run screaming from a fight??? Seems like a weird tactic.
Im not exactly sure your definition of useless as one monk player gained a heck of a lot of BP after numerous failed attempts at taking one of his cities (including a CS sent to hit before RR started), then when the army was finally able to take it, its because we decided they could take it.
Our active players have fought well and hard to keep their cities and id say are doing pretty well. I alone have survived 5 CS attempts over the last three days by alpha and the armies (who apparently arent working together but targeting the same cities suspiciously?)
And as the pact we had with alpha was a defensive pact, had alpha done their part and helped us AT all instead of just letting us support their cities, monks may have kept some of the cities they wanted to keep away from their enemies and would have made our pact and their alliance stronger....
Historically the monks stay off these forums as there is no real point to them except big talk but i couldnt let this comment pass by.
I must be playing a different game here because I thought the idea of a pact be it full or defensive meant that the alliances entering it would help each other against enemies???
Not join in the feeding frenzy and siphon off what they can from a so called 'friend'.
That is not the action of an honourable alliance, it is more in common with the actions of a parasite. A nit or a louse for example. All it shows is that there is no point whatsoever in making any sort of arrangement with y'all because it ain't worth a damn..
I must be playing a different game here because I thought the idea of a pact be it full or defensive meant that the alliances entering it would help each other against enemies???
Not join in the feeding frenzy and siphon off what they can from a so called 'friend'.
That is not the action of an honourable alliance, it is more in common with the actions of a parasite. A nit or a louse for example. All it shows is that there is no point whatsoever in making any sort of arrangement with y'all because it ain't worth a damn..
What if 2 pacts conflict?
What if 1 pact conflicts with 2 pacts?
What if 1 pact conflicts with 3 or 4 pacts?
What if you'd offered shelter from the 4 conflicting pacts under your banner and it had been rejected?
lol when a person is no longer active and quits the server after WW's and you see no militia enlisted its not taking my cities you numnutz lol, but you can keep that score, will give you a head start here lolol.. im not arguing you on ever point you make lol you keep bring the past server nicaea up like its your only life achievement, good for you.
lol, we were the only original alliance from start of serve to server end, we had the most fun, we killed the most and had the most epic battles agains you turtles, then when you leave our alliance and change our internal ann and things and leave because of a silly reason of no player attacking a city with 30% morale lol, was my fault for having a heart and giving you a chance to just sim and attack ghosts, remember you name there? lol ghosthunter L M A O.. you said you didnt want NT to win so you put every single player in that server in one alliance and used my plans of rotation to win lol what win? then you speak of being friendly so whats your plan? you want us to attack you? do not provoke me/us.. leopards/sports brian..
lol cant believe you are a founder of an alliance you still have a lot to learn padawan...
Want us to send another "regard"?
I must be playing a different game here
Yes, you play a game "survive untill few days before WW era and then join/create alliance which can gather enough resources for WW faster then other alliances."
That Crown you mention in every other post is taken without winning a single war. And you brag about? Seriously?
Alliances you been founder off never won any war, thats how good you are. On the other hand, Blaze and I as founders never lost any war. So p-i-s-s off, traitor, we have nothing to talk about, not a same league.
So considering I brought a bunch of 'simmers' (your words) together and your mighty legions couldn't destroy our wonders, but lost yours because we broke them what exactly does that make you?