Who said the top player had to be the leader? Just one of the upper leaders. No alliance can be successful if their leader only calls the shots will sitting back and simming.
Kind of like someone who has only gained 42 points on their 862 or some on point city in the past month.
Which makes me wonder why someone who isn't even actively involved in this world
1) posts so much on it's forum
and 2) feels like he should have any part with the worlds newspaper that you aren't even a part of.
Between you and joseph, you have less than 4k points combined. Why on earth you two feel you're involved enough in this world to be writing the newspaper for it is beyond reason. It's completely mental.
before you said "Some leader. 4 cities and a 2.5k average.". From that I concluded that you must have believed that there was a direct correlation between growth and leadership abilities. So naturally if this correlation were true the top players would be the best leaders. Usually that isn't the case.
You talking about me? I honestly don't know lol. Either why that isn't simming that's just inactivity.
1. Because I love talking with my BFF Sh101
2. I can read and interpret stats, I can organize, I can do interviews, I'm fairly comedic, people playing the world clearly don't have time to do a paper, and it makes you mad so that's a plus
What's really mental is you judge players by their city points and not their BP. That wouldn't change your opinion of Joseph and me of course but it's still interesting that you do that.
However, the reason why Joseph is doing this with me helping him is because no one who plays has the time, no else who doesn't play has offered, we can read and interpret sats, and we are fairly comedic. Also you need to realize everyone else is fine with this. You are the only person who has a problem with it.
