wow it seems i chose the wrong time to go inactive in the Mu forum...
*That's too bad, we missed you..
but i am going to join in this little exchange
*Oh joy, here we go!...
first of all
i still find it funny that the rest of the alliance that we shared a forum with during the so called EL war think they had anything to do with the way it went
NaT won that war and you lot did nothing to help!
*Thats where you're wrong, Francis, there was a lot going on behind the scenes: I myself was particularly involved..But its probably best I don't speak of that here..Ever wonder why your attacks on EL always went so well?
and as to why i say conquered... because technically EL were still an alliance when war ended. let me explain.. after their leaders and pretty much any other half decent sized player/city was conquered although the alliance was still there the "war" was over coz we had taken all that we wanted from them. so thats why i put conquered on the profile.. if they had disbanded then i would have put disbanded but they didnt and war was over.
*Okay I clarify: maybe disbanded is too strong a word: Most of their leaders/ more aggressive members left, abruptly..(That I know personally).With that happening the rest became leaderless /directionless: This information of course came from the restarting members, and those who joined, obviously being of the same opinion, felt the same way.. they actually KNOW what went on w/in the alliance..As do I..But it seems there were more sides to the story as we can both see...Misconceptions on both sides...We DID have members from different sides of the issue joining us/you, respectively.
ok so after the "war" NaT went back to doing their thing and taking any city that suited them and farming whoever we liked (basically we went back to how we were playing before the "war"). i myself told you
and everyone that was in that group of alliances from the beginning that we would not have an official pact with any of them and that we
never would. i clearly stated that we were only not attacking you then (i think my exact words were "coming together")
*Grr...another one with a good memory
because we were fighting a common enemy. and the only reason i even did this was because i expected at least a little bit of a fight from EL and we were going to use you as cannon folder.
*And that one smarts...ouch..
NaT has never respected your alliance and we farmed you from the second BP ended (when i say you i am of course talking about TDL,
*The farming I do not remember... now you are one so you will be referred to as one). you really should have known that at the end of the war NaT would go back to doing what was best for us.
*I did not know, you are right, but in the end I/we probably expected a bit of camaraderie/friendship from someone we had worked with..But to each their own idea, of course...Again, that's water under the bridge..No point complaining now..
so back on topic a bit... at the end of the war i was talking to CK
*He's decent..we all know that and he felt bad that you guys were still under the impression that we were friends :O so i then made a post in that shared forum with all of this. stating that NaT would do what was best for us, that we would attack and conquer who we wanted. if you did not take this literally then that is your bad not ours.
*That post was accepted, don't worry.
also as for the "most of them joined NaT" as far as i can remember we only took a few in, and only the ones that we thought had potential. most of them contacted us and asked for a spot in NaT but only a few were actually accepted and if i recall correctly most of the ones that we/i turned away went and joined you guys lol
*Most of them restarted, too...don't forget..but again that is probably why we have different sides of the story: those who joined you, like you say. Experienced members...Those who joined us were bordering on the 'refugee' status..So they'd have different points of view..Maybe you should take into account that of the 'collective poor'?
