DeletedUser
Guest
Can World Wonder stay, but not necessarily be the primary end game for any given world?
Agreed, although I think it would be better for 16 total worlds a year, one every month.
I'll sum this up simply and lay this mod/Inno Dev's dead and beaten horse of an excuse to rest.
"Worlds fill up which is why we release so quickly"
How many people Grepo worlds are build to hold:
What Grepo currently holds:
This is world 73 (2 worlds ago). What was that about worlds filling up again? You can't possibly make the argument that worlds are full or not designed to hold that many people. Sorry mod squad, you're either lying or being lied to.
I would imagine the amount of gold spent in the first 2 months of a server is more than 10 to 15 times the amount spent the remainder of the server. I don't like it at all, but thats most likely how it is. Therefore rapid world release is far more profitable than sustained worlds. You must also look at the amount of players spending gold, not just what its being spent on in different stages of a server. A world has say 30k players at the beggining of a server. Say jus 1/3 of those players spend some amount of gold. That is 10k players spending gold. In the later part of a server, even with smilos suggested idea I can't imagine more than 10k players are still playing and that is guessing high. Say 1/3 of them are spending gold, that is only 3,333 players spending gold compared to the 10k in the early stages of a server. Not to mention those players that are still spending gold are spending less than they were at the start. Rapid world release = more players spending more gold.
I am aware of most of that. Please read the entire the conversation. Thank you. This whole conversation is talking about changing that and the current dynamic that exists in Grepolis towards one that will hopefully be more rewarding and appealing to a broader range of players.
Agreed, although I think it would be better for 16 total worlds a year, one every month.
...
4) Customer satisfaction vs profits: Its not possible to have both? ...