Rate The Player

DeletedUser

Guest
Use this format to rate the player


Points: -/10 Rate their points
BP: -/10 Rank their total BP
Pos: -/10 Rank the position of their cities
Alliance: -/10 Rank their alliance
Rep: -/10 Rank their reputation/what you think of them, be it in-game or forum
 

DeletedUser

Guest
WM802:
Points: 3/10 -Over 100k, but playing for 10 months now I believe.
Attacking BP: 2/10 - Not very high
Defensive BP: 3/10 - Has been attacked and still plays - that's always good
Pos: -/10 Don't care
Alliance: 5/10 - I don't know much about em
Rep: 7/10 - active in forums unlike most people
 

DeletedUser

Guest
WM802:
Points: 3/10 -Over 100k, but playing for 10 months now I believe. Since a couple days, before June
Attacking BP: 2/10 - Not very high
Defensive BP: 3/10 - Has been attacked and still plays - that's always good
Pos: -/10 Don't care
Alliance: 5/10 - I don't know much about em
Rep: 7/10 - active in forums unlike most people

Essex
Points: 10/10
Attacking BP: 10/10
Defensive BP: 10/10
Pos: 7/10
Alliance 7/10
Rep: 6/10
 

DeletedUser

Guest
wow yea i've been off till now for months duh you more posts.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Irjene
Points: 5/10
Attacking BP: 8/10
Defensive BP: 8/10
Pos: 7/10
Alliance 6/10
Rep: 5/10

WM802
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Thats a valid point if the leaders are constantly squabbling....we don't
 

DeletedUser

Guest
how many do we have?? i mean we have council with a bunch of people but the leaders seem to be spread into a rule by council thing
 

DeletedUser

Guest
how many do we have?? i mean we have council with a bunch of people but the leaders seem to be spread into a rule by council thing

You have Sethius,Alterra,Commander Shephard,Solipicus and Callilea.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
The great thing about the leaders in Unity is that we've been working with each other in one way or another for a very long time.

We know each other and we are all on the same wavelength. I understand that working with a large leadership who disagree on everything would be a nightmare but every one of us put the welfare of the alliance first.

Plus you left out some :p
 

DeletedUser

Guest
The great thing about the leaders in Unity is that we've been working with each other in one way or another for a very long time.

We know each other and we are all on the same wavelength. I understand that working with a large leadership who disagree on everything would be a nightmare but every one of us put the welfare of the alliance first.

Plus you left out some :p

That last statement made it worse, you have to admit that.Anyway what happened to Clamenza?Did he quit, because of his computer problems?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
lol you can ridicule our leadership if you like but it works for us.

As for clamenza, tbh I think he had a combination of computer problems and just losing interest in the game.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
lol you can ridicule our leadership if you like but it works for us.

As for clamenza, tbh I think he had a combination of computer problems and just losing interest in the game.

Thought that anyway, did we have a one sided pact against orthia?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
That was a very complicated issue. It was two sided in many areas and even co-operative but in other areas not so much.

P.S. it wasn't a pact, it was a NAP
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
... thread is being ruined by spam that could of been done in a PM. Would be nice to have a thread of just ratings - not have to read through 10 posts of a questionnaire/argument.

irjene:
Points: 4/10 - Over 100k, but playing for about a year now
Attacking BP: 3/10 - Not very high
Defensive BP: 4/10 - Loses a good amount of cities, but still hanging on
Pos: -/10 - Don't care
Alliance: 5/10 - Don't know 'em
Rep: 6/10
 
Top