MRA? lol
Well, i dont think those grounds were reasonable enough for us to be called and classified as an MRA. Its not really our fault if they want to join us or not. If they want to leave so be it, but they just have to be careful not to make any mistake about joining enemy allies. lol. You see, the option of joining us is always voluntary and very well negotiated, and the fact that many players consider that negotiation is a sign of a reputable alliance. Now, about the players who you claim you talked to, It was out of FEAR, that they are talking that way, please tell them that if they really want to leave, then we have nothing to lose, lols.
And dude, we never were an MRA, i'd rather call it a diplomatically centered Alliance (thanks to our ever greatest diplomat Glidril for that). Just like PE and VROD we started out as a small alliance, so you couldnt really classify us as an MRA cause if you do, you'll be classifying other allies as one too which is definitely not.
and about the cs chucking thing, yeah, i admit it is hard on our part because we are attacking BIG frontliner players unlike the ones you guys are attacking, which are either inactive or smaller players. Plus the fact that this game favors much the defender. And oh the stats, once again, it came from smaller and not so active players. So far, you guys were still not able to conquer much city from CLE as of now aside from ONE of our inactives. Most of your conquers were from small players and smaller parts of our empire (e.g, ravens etc) which i wouldnt be PROUD of for giving your guys your most PRECIOUS stats.
But oh instead, we're waving goodbyes to the red dots. But we are not yet declaring that we are winning this war yet because its too early. Id rather see the map as a basis of winning the war than those lousy stats. About the players turning into VM because of RL, hmm, ("good excuse huh") hehe.