Top 12 Sink or Swim+Discussion

DeletedUser

Guest
Event is over so once theyre killed itll be the last time maby of these players reach that amount of them.
 

DeletedUser44321

Guest
EN Declares war on Bloods action about to heat up let the fun begin
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Turning on there allies and absorbing there members into one of there many academies. Who would have seen such an unforeseeable outcome :p
 

DeletedUser21287

Guest
Deus Pravus said:
Turning on there allies and absorbing there members into one of there many academies. Who would have seen such an unforeseeable outcome :p
Click to expand...

It was always going to be this way, if anybody thought otherwise then more fool them. They also did not turn on us, they announced that it was over in a message to our leaders which was communicated to the rest of us so fair play to them. By the way this is not a negative comment toward EN, far from it. Only that it was inevitable for this world to have any point to it.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Interesting concept, by announcing to someone you are going to turn on them you are in fact not turning on them.
 

DeletedUser21287

Guest
Deus Pravus said:
Interesting concept, by announcing to someone you are going to turn on them you are in fact not turning on them.
Click to expand...

I have known some alliances not even give reason and just attack if in their best interest.
 

DeletedUser21287

Guest
Slothbozeman said:
That's the best reason to attack, is it not?

Why would you attack if it's not in your best interest?
Click to expand...


of course, I am talking about a situation where 2 alliances are pacted/allied in some way. very rare an ally attacks unless it is in their best interest, why else would they do it.
 

DeletedUser44426

Guest
So any new top 12 discussions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser44426

Guest
I'm dying of boredom here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Deus Pravus said:
Interesting concept, by announcing to someone you are going to turn on them you are in fact not turning on them.
Click to expand...

You are ignorant.

For those on the outside looking in, wondering why?

Explanation: Bloods absorbed Legion of Death (Our enemies) as a wing. After taking in half of JTT/TS (Our enemies). All of which were in the direction we chose to head. We chose to head that way I am assuming, because Bloods had 55 and 44/45 was the only direction we could go unless going to war initially. Bloods in turn took our food out from under us, hence the clash. Basic math.

To your comment... Our leaders sent Bloods leadership a notice of the void in partnership. Thanked them for everything they had done up until this point, and left off on good terms. That is how our leaders operate. Respectfully. Our alliance was advised not to attack Bloods (Minus the LOD/JTT members they took in), to honor the notice. So we didn't "announce to turn on someone, just to not turn on them". Our leaders did this by the book in every aspect.

Only question now is, what will the haters say now that Bloods/EN aren't aligned? Perhaps we are sprinkling magical pixy dust on our nukes. Or we are stashing dragon balls in our caves. Silly rabbit, trix are for kids...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser44321

Guest
Praehelios said:
You are ignorant.

For those on the outside looking in, wondering why?

Explanation: Bloods absorbed Legion of Death (Our enemies) as a wing. After taking in half of JTT/TS (Our enemies). All of which were in the direction we chose to head. We chose to head that way I am assuming, because Bloods had 55 and 44/45 was the only direction we could go unless going to war initially. Bloods in turn took our food out from under us, hence the clash. Basic math.

To your comment... Our leaders sent Bloods leadership a notice of the void in partnership. Thanked them for everything they had done up until this point, and left off on good terms. That is how our leaders operate. Respectfully. Our alliance was advised not to attack Bloods (Minus the LOD/JTT members they took in), to honor the notice. So we didn't "announce to turn on someone, just to not turn on them". Our leaders did this by the book in every aspect.

Only question now is, what will the haters say now that Bloods/EN aren't aligned? Perhaps we are sprinkling magical pixy dust on our nukes. Or we are stashing dragon balls in our caves. Silly rabbit, trix are for kids...
Click to expand...




hmm, you took in JTT as well there body and accepted your own food your at fault as well
 

DeletedUser36743

Guest
mac-man said:
hmm, you took in JTT as well there body and accepted your own food your at fault as well
Click to expand...

There is a difference... many in JTT are friends... things just went downhill thanx to cheap politics pursued by some in their leadership...

for eg: Robh started with us...moved to JTT and then back...some others i had personally invited to play with us before the start of the server...

It appears the diff in taking in 5 peeps and the entire alliance as a wing is lost on you...
 

DeletedUser

Guest
mac-man said:
hmm, you took in JTT as well there body and accepted your own food your at fault as well
Click to expand...

There is a vast difference between the two. We went to war with an alliance, and when members throw out the white flag (Most friends from past servers), we took them in. Bloods however were not at war with JTT. They took the spoils without working for it. That would be like us turning NUNS into a branch. How would that be viewed as a righteous thing to do? Especially after Bloods had been working so hard on cracking them. There is an unwritten rule in the game. Do not give shelter to your friends enemies. By taking in 10 Million worth of players, they forced the issue. Had they not had done that we would of had plenty of players to attack and grow off of and there would be no conflict.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top