Jamovic said:
I had no idea the French made synthetic life like animated blow up mannequins..is 'she' one you blow up?..is hard to clean when you are finished or can you remove her parts and put them in the dishwasher? I suppose it must be nice to have some one in your life you can talk to that doesn't call you a tw*t.
Might have known you would chime in with some classless comment about my partner.
On the brightside, At least I have never been and am not currently engaged to my own right hand.. Unlike some...
No, this is called talking cr*p:
What did I say in there that has not already been demonstrated as true? You are a coward, Fact.. You got others to do your dirty work, Fact..
Its not "talking cr*p" because everything I said is actually demonstrably true..
Funny how you and GM didn't make a move against me the entire game except for your 1000-packet spies but now you send me messages like that and spell me continuously.
I have already told you, We where working down a hitlist. First Codfish, Then Jonny, Then you... Your attacks where coming, We just need to know what we where up against in terms of initial defence and which appeared to be the best targets to hit. What you thought we where going to go in blind?. First step was always to make you nervous with spies, This also served as a good means of gaining intel and recon to see if you where restocking or where demanding support in fear of an op, Then the second step was to smash the sh!% out of what we deemed the best targets.
"(Oh pardon me, there was one time where you attacked me in February or something like that because you thought I was out of VM and not around only to find out how wrong you were.)"
Its called testing the waters Arch, Your stats showed that you appeared to inactive as you had little to no growth. So I sent a couple of attacks at you to see if you where active or not. Those troops I lost where quickly rebuilt so no real loss. Nice to see you finally remember that your previous statements about us not attacking you was incorrect though..
"The GM has been smart enough to save his favour for elsewhere, I guess, but you have successfully been lured into wasting it on my city."
Lured? lol I only spelled you because I knew it would annoy you. Evidenced by the fact that you had others return the favour on me and have been protecting your city. Iam not the one who seemingly demanded loads of Long Term Support to hide behind and res to build up wall and stack the cave.
Who in the hell messages everyone who sends them a negative spell except you? You were doing this under the guise of trying to find out what I said about you.
Considering that only three people in the whole of Apoc even spelled me, Yes I did message each one of them.. Its not like everyone in Apoc spelled me or something like that. Iam just amused that one or two of them objected to the factual city name I had in place.
Are you kidding me? Why do you care? You were probably hoping the one-on-one contact would stop them from sending spells (which it probably did), not to mention your usual trick of trying to get information out of people.
Actually Arch I learned more than you might think from those messages, not so much if they reply, more when they reply and how quickly they reply..
Regardless of that, why send them messages? You must have been a little disappointed to know that I didn't say much at all.
And yourself and Sir Cod where never been above a little bit of gloating have you? Happy to give it, but completely unwilling to take it?
And why does it bother or surprise you that I put your name up for a negative spell campaign? You seemed as good a candidate as any, and better than most. You're not the only one sending me spells and spies, and all that just "coincidentally" happened to start the exact same day you noticed my city, not before.
Perhaps your forgetting about the seven day protection period on Herm for new players and those who restart? I noticed you just after you returned but was unable to do anything about it as I was using favor to rebuild troops and boats following my sucessful conquest of an Active Apoc player and secondly and secondly due to your protection period. Once I had rebuilt to a decent level I was able to start quaking you.
So, what, it's okay for you to put my name up but not okay for me to put yours up?
Never said that, But at least Iam actually willing to get my hands dirty and do some work myself.
And please ask anyone there if I have messaged them asking to "find out" what you have said about me. What ridiculous behaviour.
I was curious to know what lies you where spreading so I came right out and directly asked those who actually spelled me, Ridiculous in your mind. Straight to the point in mine.
Consider that you have sent a few MM's to AZT, there might be a reason people jump to that conclusion.
Maybe, But at the same time if people are unable or unwilling to answer a simple question, That is hardly my fault.
If we want to get picky, I'm sure we could all get each other banned. I'm looking through some of the rules right now and I'm pretty sure we have all broken them at some point. And by "all" I mean both TD and AZT.
Is that an admission of guilt to something Arch? Besides who said anything about getting anyone banned? I never reported Dave of Scotland. Someone I forwarded his message onto did that. Its not my fault he used inappropriate language in his first reply to me and failed to answer a simple question.
What in the world are you going on about? lol. This is all I posted:
And that was all I ever wanted to know Arch. Like I said Arch, I was curious and this little fact finding mission helped me learn a few things, Not only how closed minded some of your members are, But also how willing or unwilling they where to talk. Considering that I was able to have a short but decent conversation with Audrixium that didnt resort to mud throwing it does show how tightly wound some members of Apoc actually are.
Do you require long speeches and propaganda campaigns in TD to motivate people to do anything?
No, Why do Apoc require that?
And exactly how much headway would I make with TD trying to counter all the nonsense I'm sure you have spewed about me? I would not be surprised if you have said far, far more about me (and Sir Cod and Jonny) than any of us did about you. But anyway, get over it, dude, you're about as likely to get people here to like you as I would be trying to get TD to like me. The difference is that I'm not going to message people there out of nowhere to "set the record straight."
Like I said Arch it was a fact finding mission, I learned more about Apoc than you think as well as confirming a number of things about a couple of players. Apart from calling you Archi the Coward, No I have said nothing overly negative about you or the matter on the TD forum.
At least not when others like Exo and GPig who actually know you have been chipping in with their own comments about you.
First of all, if it's someone with a dual account, they should be aware of this:
"Each Grepolis player may only use one account for Forum use, regardless of the number of accounts he or she has ingame."
Secondly, umm, how about I point to post #58 where you literally say, "I reckon you are on Herm and like him [Jamo] are playing using differnt account across differnt worlds. I think I have figured out your account name on Herm. Not GM, Thats too obvious.. But I reckon I know who you are, Your spelling of "Archimedes" was the give away.."
Because I think I know who it is that instantly means they are in TD?, You think the only people I speak to are in TD? Well that idea is shattered by the conversation above isn't it.. Plus I didn't specificaly say that it was someone from Herm. I said I reckoned it was someone playing across differnt worlds with differnt accounts names, That is clearly not GM as he uses The GM account on Sinope, Herm, Zancule and Bhrytos.
Thirdly, someone with about 10 posts to their name is not going to send rep like that to someone they have just met.
Maybe he has been reading the forums for sometime and only just started posting?
Fourthly, stop acting like we can be like some prosecutor. Not sure if you've noticed, but unlike a court of law, we can't petition Inno to give us access to someone's account, so there is no way to "prove" certain things as you would be able to in a court of law.
Just saying Arch we should be consistant, The rule of law and the layout of the courts is innocent until proven, It is like that to be fair. As someone who has been accused of numerous things here on this very forum I would have welcomed a fair and honest judgement rather than just being baselessly accused of things inspite of evidence for them. This isn't Isis or Saudi Arabia where people are beheaded on suspicion of being Gay or as is the case in Saudi Arabia a woman is arrested for being raped. Just saying I assume we all live in countries with modern values, Perhaps for once we should show them for once.
Even Red thinks GGN is a bit of a d**che:
Sorry Red, it really isn't anything against you, I just wanted to have some fun with the text.
Yep its amazing what you can do when you chop out large chunks of text to make it fit a presupposed conclusion. I could I wished imply that Hitler was a supporter of Jewish rights via the same methods if I wished.. Doesn't make it true.