DeletedUser47415
Guest
yes they will.
The Future of Hero Worlds Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Baudin Toolan
- Start date
DeletedUser5819
Guest
Well if you know so much perhaps you should answer your own question.
DeletedUser47415
Guest
it was a question of when not if.
If you read the update to this initial announcement, Innogames decided to not add the World Wonders to the Hero Worlds based on player feedback across all markets. No market or individual Hero World will be getting the World Wonders.
DeletedUser47415
Guest
Ive read the update. It didnt say 'decided'(which the initial paradoxically enough said) it said 'new suggestion'.
DeletedUser47415
Guest
this is obviously false.
DeletedUser5819
Guest
No, it says "New Solution"
I am beginning to think you are trolling.
DeletedUser47415
Guest
I see something has been lost in translation. On mine it said new suggestion. Doesent really matter though. The first 'proposal' was worded as a decision and was changed, thus so can this be as well. And I ecxpect it to be changed. Anything else would be absurd. Innogames is a commercial company, in this day and age a company simply cant provide such **** **** service to their customer(players)
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser47415
Guest
Jupp, like I said, 'solution' was translated as 'suggestion' on the announcement i recieved.
DeletedUser47415
Guest
Trolling aside, I find it telling that no effort is been made to answer my original points and questions. They were valid points, but have been strided past in silence. Theres is an apparent selectiveness in which questions are answered and not.
I can recapitulate them if memory is at lack:
*why is the solution to not have WW after all been claimed to have come about after feedback from players across all markets when it clearly isnt? There are glearing gaps in the methodology used(as I have pointed out earlier). At least there should be an admittance that the feedback-collecting-process has had obvious faults, there hasnt. One cant claim to listen to the wishes of the players when one dont. You cant have your cake and eat it too.
*Why cant this question be threated differently for each Hero World? Its all to tempting to think that it is 'to much hazzle to bothered with', I hope and assume theres a more justicified reason that respects the players more than that, so Id appreciate to have it proclaimed.
I for one will not spend an ounce of gold, not only not on HW but not on ordinary servers as well, before this issue is cleared up, and WW implemented on HW were it is relevant. I ecxpect more customer service than is provided with this issue as an example.
I can recapitulate them if memory is at lack:
*why is the solution to not have WW after all been claimed to have come about after feedback from players across all markets when it clearly isnt? There are glearing gaps in the methodology used(as I have pointed out earlier). At least there should be an admittance that the feedback-collecting-process has had obvious faults, there hasnt. One cant claim to listen to the wishes of the players when one dont. You cant have your cake and eat it too.
*Why cant this question be threated differently for each Hero World? Its all to tempting to think that it is 'to much hazzle to bothered with', I hope and assume theres a more justicified reason that respects the players more than that, so Id appreciate to have it proclaimed.
I for one will not spend an ounce of gold, not only not on HW but not on ordinary servers as well, before this issue is cleared up, and WW implemented on HW were it is relevant. I ecxpect more customer service than is provided with this issue as an example.
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser47415
Guest
...silence speaks a thousand words.
I do sleep and have work to attend and can't answer immediately........
As for your question: Yes there were indeed people who did want WW on the Hero Worlds however the majority of people across the various markets did not want them. Couple that with the fact that Inno had indeed originally stated at the start of the Hero Worlds that there would be no WW on those types of worlds and they decided to reverse their decision to add WW once they found the Hero Worlds were not working out.
They cannot have WW on some Hero Worlds and not on the others as not every player on every worlds is of the same opinion in regards to the addition of WW to their Hero World. Also keeping the decision uniform makes it easier to implement and run.
As for your question: Yes there were indeed people who did want WW on the Hero Worlds however the majority of people across the various markets did not want them. Couple that with the fact that Inno had indeed originally stated at the start of the Hero Worlds that there would be no WW on those types of worlds and they decided to reverse their decision to add WW once they found the Hero Worlds were not working out.
They cannot have WW on some Hero Worlds and not on the others as not every player on every worlds is of the same opinion in regards to the addition of WW to their Hero World. Also keeping the decision uniform makes it easier to implement and run.
DeletedUser47415
Guest
NP
How would one know? No vote was taken.
This argument has lost its validity since innogames has admitted that HW didnt work, and is not going to be continuned as planned anyway. The 'concept' of HW is discontiuned, no new HW will be started(as I understand), the remaining question Id presume is what to do with the existing HWs. It would seem the most natural to do what the players want, no?
This would be the case with some worlds, not others. I mean it literary when I say everyone on the HW I play wants a WW(or any end game for that mather.
This is not really an argument is it? Unless meant as an admittion on my concern that innogames just cant be bothered to give the players the service they pay for?
There was no vote as they took the feedback from all of their forums where they had created discussion thread for players to share their opinion on the subject.
DeletedUser47415
Guest
I know. Thats why I pointed out the errors in methodology made, and explained why an unrealistic skewdness would have resulted.
DeletedUser31747
Guest
dude, enough...we get your point, its not changing
So, i have been away from grep for ages now, has this been implemented yet, i mean has the HW stuff like increased levels, artemis and etc been implemented into warrior worlds
DeletedUser
Guest
It isn't being added to older worlds, I think it has been implemented on Rhammus though.
DeletedUser
Guest
I fully agree with bytting. Especially the HW on the Norwegian server is pretty much dead. The players have been playing for 2 years, and no point for new players to join when most players have 2-7 million points.
Why can't Innogames come up with a solution which suits everyone? For instance, no WW on the .en server, but WW on the Norwegian server, WW on the Italian server etc.
Create a survey on each forum for each server, THEN come to a decision on what to do, making each server special, and the solution which suits each server the most.
Why on earth should the players on the HWs continue playing when Innogames won't listen to them, or at least give a proper answer?
Amen.
Why can't Innogames come up with a solution which suits everyone? For instance, no WW on the .en server, but WW on the Norwegian server, WW on the Italian server etc.
Create a survey on each forum for each server, THEN come to a decision on what to do, making each server special, and the solution which suits each server the most.
Why on earth should the players on the HWs continue playing when Innogames won't listen to them, or at least give a proper answer?
Amen.
DeletedUser22940
Guest
The issue here Julio is that they are taking their feedback from what has been defined as the "vocal minority" in this particular case.
Funny how when the situation suits them, the forums for feedback is good enough to make a decision. But when the feedback is not how they want it to be, they define us as a minority.
Funny how when the situation suits them, the forums for feedback is good enough to make a decision. But when the feedback is not how they want it to be, they define us as a minority.