Funny how folk see things differently, overall i thought the main fighters in each group were very similar, possibly even FN having more of the lions share, but at the end of the day WW and DOM boils down to numbers...
Never under estimate your enemy, many derigotory messages were received by myself when "you presumed" we were big turtles..How disgusted some were of how we play the game.....Not nice.. Its called tactics, for some of you that dont know what that means..
You got caught with your pants down, its as simple as that... burning off defence on adapt to build more offence was just hilarious and ultimately you paid the price...mistakes were made by your leaders, not the players... you wernt ready when we hit and lost the game then, suddenly you had no defence and were on the back foot.. game over...We had changed direction...
As for BP, while fn were fighting noob allances in the north we were fighting True fear, a good solid alliance in the west, some hard battles, not easy mass BP. A true fighiting group, which once again like other allies, there best joined you.....
As for poors and friends, i wont even go into that, you took the best out of every ally you could, we just tried to cut off your supply, which once again was a strategy to simply make you run out of numbers and it worked aswell..
All teams have inactives, it happens, you just run out of recruitment options once we took them away from you..
FN should of won i agree,, but ultimately respect the strategy of a war game and how the leaders of poors out thought FNs.
We set a trap you fell into it, we took away recruitment options you ran out of players.....
Strategy well played in my opinion