DeletedUser
Guest
like i sead bud i dont know about internal affairs..but a lot of alliances have a one week rule for inactives before thay get kicked..now when a player is inactive and his city is attacked and unless anuther member of his alliance has a trip within his citys then the alliance has no option but to kick them ...how i ask ..well inactives are 1. easy targets .2 . also 9 times outa 10 there idol for a reason the best of witch is that thay are on the front line and getting hammerd..and are just scaired to ask for help ..now the leaders cant be held to account for kicking these people for them being idol now can thay.now the person that gets booted out by these alliances,the person getting the boot is to blame for not telling enyone there going away ..if you had informed enyone within the alliance then trips and the like could have been put in your citys so the alliance know if you where under attack ...you see people playing this game dont just attack on the off chance that thay will get lucky and get a city the more prolific players will use there heads and look at the stats of the alliance and see who is inactine who hasnt made a move in a week .if you persist in being inactive you must expect to get the boot after all you idolness affect the whole alliance not just as you say a red dot ...now i may lose some citys but i also take citys an idole person cant take a city if he dusnt play but he can lose one if he fails to tell enyone what he is up to
That was a lot of words to try to rationalize what I said. However, that wasn't what I said happened. The players were active. They simply had the bad luck of getting conquered when no one could get to their aid. They were dumped from the alliance and picked right back up after the conquest.
It was all about keeping the nearly spotless RdlM record clean.
Ben has admitted in these forums that it happened at least once....