DeletedUser29446
Guest
I've said to myself that i will not post, but you Dave, i think i know your ingame name by the tone you are writing and posting ), you are one of a kind. is there no dignity in you to admit thatYou debate over who has good leadership is again scewed, you are with MFW and would say and do anything for them as not to look like a total horses butt on the forums so your opinion is just that....just like everyone elses who has one. The only difference is in the players and the execution of what leadership puts out, not in the leadership itself.
1. we have won the group stage (war in O65. you can cry that we had spies, but i can tell you this. even if we have had a spies, why there were so many CS attempt on us there? because... you had spies in your ranks?)
2. we have won the semi finals... we out played you guys in O55 for artemisia city. I can't stop saying that... it makes me feel so good, because you were 2 times bigger then us and we made it (i give you my word, without spies... don't know how spies could have helped in this epic battle)
3. we haven't won the finale yet, but it is 85th minute, we have a lead of 2-0. It seams good, but lets wait for the referee to blow the whistle.
now you want to say that all Swarm or SoD players are bad, because they didn't follow your unique tactic? you left your posts in O65, just to prepare for the WW stage...The only difference is in the players and the execution of what leadership puts out, not in the leadership itself
Do you seriously think that a 60 members alliance can beat 120 members alliance in a race for resources???And no, MFW that was MFW did not beat SoD alone, both made moves to fill their rosters and make a run for the WWs
You were lucky, we were not on that serverI personally have led 5 different wins on servers whether that is 4/7 or 7/7, so yes my leadership has and always has been solid.