DeletedUser19042
Guest
the "giving my son pocket money" argument fits perfectley, it's highlighting the fact that untill I have clicked "confirm" on payment type my money is exaclty that, MY MONEY and just because I was thinking about buying gold doesn't make it inno's money (it wouldn't anyway because by your reckoning I still owe porche a lot of cash)
and that random bunch of words about a tv??????? read up on retail law, if they had a tv and he walks out with it then yes he's shoplifting, if they had a tv in the window on offer and removed it then that tv is no longer on offer!!!!
I'm trying to see both sides but when you come back with that kind of twoddle you make it very VERY hard
That's not true.
You wanted to buy gold, but give it to your son.
Here that gold was a GIFT. No one had to pay for it. But they abused it.
It's like having a candy from someone (who's giving it to a lot of children) and then get back in line at the back pretending to be someone else and do it over and over again...until other kids don't get anything at all. This is a very stupid example, but it's how I see it.
And yes, I know you are trying to see it from both ways. I'm just correcting you on one of those ways.
Last edited by a moderator: