has that got anything to do with the fact vivs team has been rimming loads of your alliance or was this totaly impartial and just based on your opinion that if its not against the rules then its ok.
I put forward a reasoned argument for why I think the way I do and it has nothing to do with being on opposite sides in a war. I actually even wrote a story about how I used this approach myself when I was a newbie.
This is a common tactic of yours I note. You don't like someone's argument so you call it invalid because they 'don't play on this server' or 'their team is getting rimmed'.
ad ho·mi·nem
[ad hom-uh-nuhm -nem, ahd‐]
adjective
1. appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason.
2. attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument.
I don't know whether I should bother to continue to debate with you about this. It seems like a waste of time.
once upon a time it was legal to have slaves to subdigate women and people of diferant races amoungst other less savory things its only people who stand by and aspire to being more morale that change society.
just cause its legal does not make it right!
This is argument is ridiculous and laughable. Bolting someone in a game is comparable to slavery and the subjugation of women? What the ... ?
You talk about right and wrong as though those words have any meaning in a game like Grepolis where people routinely use tactics of meta gaming (forum PnPs, spies, breaking pacts/NAPs, etc) to further their goal but for some reason a perfectly valid game mechanic like bolting someone is 'wrong' and 'dishonourable'.
I just, I don't even...
ETA fininished reading the thread. And now bolting someone is a 'hate campaign'.
You really need to get some perspective.