DeletedUser
Guest
the reply pt II
too bad this isn't about you vs. MAP; this is about all the other people fighting alongside of you vs. MAP.
so, its 13 - 6 MAP, factor in about 18 Guppy cities who you left high and dry after he helped you attack us and spy on our cities, and that makes it: 31-6 MAP. now those are some nice numbers; thank you for bringing up these numbers Coco I'm glad you did; they really help illustrate what I was trying to show before.
oh right, it requires such vast amounts of skill to devote 5 cities worth of defensive ships and troops to stack a city that's in the middle of enemy territory. seriously, are you BRAGGING about holding this city? you realize that we could take that city whenever we wanted to, right? but that we don't feel like sacrificing 100k or more troops and ships right now to get it? of course, I'm sure in your warped reality that must mean we are 'afraid' right? here is the pathetic thing about you: were we to attack and take the city, you would then be on here bragging and preaching about your "wonderful victory" and how you "made a city cost us 100k troops" - because you just like to talk so much don't you?
blah blah blah; you have over 100 cities in O43 (and it used to be quite a bit more); it was one of your stronghold oceans. we now have 32 cities in O43 N. that's all that matters
again, you are bragging about RETAKING six cities deep in your territory that we TOOK FROM YOU just a few months ago; you have done NOTHING the front is completely bogged down right now and you know it; all your grandstanding is pretty pathetic.
for one, MAP don't make ourselves out to be great or anything else; read our profile, it is abstract for a reason. we do not brag. plenty of other people doing that on these forums. I'll tell you one thing coco, you can say what you want about our fighting abilities, but WE took O42, not EOW - and we have systematically driven out any alliances that constitute what we consider a threat in O42, and EOW had nothing to do with that either... But we will continue to work as a team, and to work with our allies as a team and you can say what you want about our fighting prowess we prefer to let the game do our talking
you are such a joker lol
would you really be so dense that you would bring this up? I would think it'd be a black eye for you.
you got Guppy to work with you and sbzwei and sloppycus to attack us; and then when we went after Guppy, you all left him high and dry. and yes, we went after Guppy first because he was attacking us from WITHIN O42; I'm sure you knew this would happen, which just makes you even more scandalous. you basically caused Guppy to lose all of those cities; you talked him into helping you, probably promised to support him, left him high and dry and let him lose essentially all of his O42 cities, and now have the gumption to talk down to us about attacking 'weak' players? you are quite a piece of work lol
I love you posting these numbers, it makes it so easy for me.
so what you posted up there shows that you take more ghost cities then myself or op.ivy (not sure when comparing our personal game stats became what this argument was about). What I really wonder is, why didn't you include the personal comparison stats between you, myself, and op.ivy showing cannibal conquers? is it because you are a big fan of taking your fellow alliance members cities, and we aren't?
regarding our so-called cannibalism, I wonder where your link to grepostats is for this one? is it because if someone were to look, they would see we very rarely cannibalize our own players? we only have 15 members coco; we don't have players who are inactive and quitting constantly that need to have their cities taken. we aren't in a big MRA like Orthia, so we don't need to cannibalize like you do.
oh right, so that means we better rush down and attack you this instance, on your schedule. do you know nothing of warfare? let me put it to you this way: IF YOU WANT US TO ATTACK YOU, THEN CONSTITUTE A THREAT TO US. we don't view you as a threat, so therefore, we can stick to our long term plan and goals, and do not need to move 'Orthia and coco' up in our list of priorities. its that simple; and no amount of goading on the forums, nor probing night attacks, nor emails to our members trying to get them to leave MAP, nor renaming your cities to stupid things when we attack you, NONE of those things are going to make us regard you as a threat. you have to actually come up here and do some damage to us, if you want to get that kind of treatment. so PUT UP, or SHUT UP.
the only thing I find shocking? is that you spend as much time as you do at this game, and aren't the #1 player on this world. Their is really no excuse; its not a matter of skill. you just have such a non-life that you try to, I don't know, supplement it by being on here all the time? but you aren't even that good; part time players are better then you. so at the end of the day, you've got to ask yourself, whats the point coco?
now, as fun as this was, have a bad day coco
I have taken,(still ignoring Maden) 2 from highly active and aggressive MAP players.
Cocotte 2:2 MAP
too bad this isn't about you vs. MAP; this is about all the other people fighting alongside of you vs. MAP.
so, its 13 - 6 MAP, factor in about 18 Guppy cities who you left high and dry after he helped you attack us and spy on our cities, and that makes it: 31-6 MAP. now those are some nice numbers; thank you for bringing up these numbers Coco I'm glad you did; they really help illustrate what I was trying to show before.
1 of which has been there for 6 months and withstood EVERY attack you have ever thrown at it, even when surrounded on all sides.
I wasn't going to start a MAP ENDING thread until we had pushed well past the 42 border, only then would it have been worth talking about.
oh right, it requires such vast amounts of skill to devote 5 cities worth of defensive ships and troops to stack a city that's in the middle of enemy territory. seriously, are you BRAGGING about holding this city? you realize that we could take that city whenever we wanted to, right? but that we don't feel like sacrificing 100k or more troops and ships right now to get it? of course, I'm sure in your warped reality that must mean we are 'afraid' right? here is the pathetic thing about you: were we to attack and take the city, you would then be on here bragging and preaching about your "wonderful victory" and how you "made a city cost us 100k troops" - because you just like to talk so much don't you?
And in 43 Orthia was recently ranked 3rd in o43 never first, behind AlphaBeta (still 1st) and Death Angels (currently disbanding).
blah blah blah; you have over 100 cities in O43 (and it used to be quite a bit more); it was one of your stronghold oceans. we now have 32 cities in O43 N. that's all that matters
To put this simply, since the Orthia/EOW war ended, MAP have taken ZERO cities from Orthia during that period they have lost 6 unarguable cities to Orthia.
again, you are bragging about RETAKING six cities deep in your territory that we TOOK FROM YOU just a few months ago; you have done NOTHING the front is completely bogged down right now and you know it; all your grandstanding is pretty pathetic.
Once again proving my point, without their large and powerful neighbours to do all the work for them, MAP are nowhere near as great as they make themselves out to be.
for one, MAP don't make ourselves out to be great or anything else; read our profile, it is abstract for a reason. we do not brag. plenty of other people doing that on these forums. I'll tell you one thing coco, you can say what you want about our fighting abilities, but WE took O42, not EOW - and we have systematically driven out any alliances that constitute what we consider a threat in O42, and EOW had nothing to do with that either... But we will continue to work as a team, and to work with our allies as a team and you can say what you want about our fighting prowess we prefer to let the game do our talking
They prey on easy targets like Poecilia reticulata, with their one decent member, Guppy, to bulk up their stats, then accuse others of conquering only grey cities.
you are such a joker lol
would you really be so dense that you would bring this up? I would think it'd be a black eye for you.
you got Guppy to work with you and sbzwei and sloppycus to attack us; and then when we went after Guppy, you all left him high and dry. and yes, we went after Guppy first because he was attacking us from WITHIN O42; I'm sure you knew this would happen, which just makes you even more scandalous. you basically caused Guppy to lose all of those cities; you talked him into helping you, probably promised to support him, left him high and dry and let him lose essentially all of his O42 cities, and now have the gumption to talk down to us about attacking 'weak' players? you are quite a piece of work lol
Cocotte 30% grey conquests, Ana 25%, Ivy 20% (allow a 2% range of inaccuracy).
That's not including the shocking rates of cannibalism in MAP.
I love you posting these numbers, it makes it so easy for me.
so what you posted up there shows that you take more ghost cities then myself or op.ivy (not sure when comparing our personal game stats became what this argument was about). What I really wonder is, why didn't you include the personal comparison stats between you, myself, and op.ivy showing cannibal conquers? is it because you are a big fan of taking your fellow alliance members cities, and we aren't?
regarding our so-called cannibalism, I wonder where your link to grepostats is for this one? is it because if someone were to look, they would see we very rarely cannibalize our own players? we only have 15 members coco; we don't have players who are inactive and quitting constantly that need to have their cities taken. we aren't in a big MRA like Orthia, so we don't need to cannibalize like you do.
That's not even to mention the number of participants in this skirmish!
3 from Orthia are on the front lines (sensible conquest distance), with TEN MAP (Anarqy, Fanforlife,Dragon keeper,Sasoloff,Noobie1,Spartus The First, Dyrill,Edward Newgate,Apshai Templar,IenaMN) with the remaining 5 inside reasonable striking distance.
oh right, so that means we better rush down and attack you this instance, on your schedule. do you know nothing of warfare? let me put it to you this way: IF YOU WANT US TO ATTACK YOU, THEN CONSTITUTE A THREAT TO US. we don't view you as a threat, so therefore, we can stick to our long term plan and goals, and do not need to move 'Orthia and coco' up in our list of priorities. its that simple; and no amount of goading on the forums, nor probing night attacks, nor emails to our members trying to get them to leave MAP, nor renaming your cities to stupid things when we attack you, NONE of those things are going to make us regard you as a threat. you have to actually come up here and do some damage to us, if you want to get that kind of treatment. so PUT UP, or SHUT UP.
The only thing I find shocking about this alliance is the high regard EOW holds them in. MAP/EOW war was back when MAP was larger, and EOW was a hell of a lot smaller.
This was before the EOW/Orthia war, and being fair, EOW were, on the whole, terrible at the start of that war, then progressively improving to the point were they could pull off very impressive conquests.
EOW hold them in the same high regard as they did in the days many of them attacked MAP using "Pegasus nukes".
the only thing I find shocking? is that you spend as much time as you do at this game, and aren't the #1 player on this world. Their is really no excuse; its not a matter of skill. you just have such a non-life that you try to, I don't know, supplement it by being on here all the time? but you aren't even that good; part time players are better then you. so at the end of the day, you've got to ask yourself, whats the point coco?
now, as fun as this was, have a bad day coco
Last edited by a moderator: