DeletedUser
Guest
Vyck is an inactive player Finton.
Ok exploro, yes i am on your side but we know that was a lie. Vyck woke up yesterday with cs' in both of his cities and decided he didn't like the game anymore and quit so he told us not to bother breaking those sieges as he was having no fun. He even ventured far enough to say Aurora is the reason his game experience was less than satisfactory. I am sorry I'd like to support you but I dont wanna see excuses
Vyck is an inactive player Finton.
Not to suggest anything you don't already know, but perhaps there's someone deleting topics off of your forum? (",)
Ok exploro, yes i am on your side but we know that was a lie. Vyck woke up yesterday with cs' in both of his cities and decided he didn't like the game anymore and quit so he told us not to bother breaking those sieges as he was having no fun. He even ventured far enough to say Aurora is the reason his game experience was less than satisfactory. I am sorry I'd like to support you but I dont wanna see excuses
I really don't know, but you should check our skype more often...there is never very much to read over as it is barely active![]()
Exploro it's called a trip wire network. Do you understand that concept?
If your alliance Implements a solid trip wire network you will know every time one of your members is attacked. If i lose a city in (E.O.D) it is not my inactive members fault. I also can't blame that he is asleep or afk... It would be my fault. All blame should fall were it belongs on the leaderships/Founders shoulders.
As a Leader you are here to server your members. Not have them serve you.
Ok exploro, yes i am on your side but we know that was a lie. Vyck woke up yesterday with cs' in both of his cities and decided he didn't like the game anymore and quit so he told us not to bother breaking those sieges as he was having no fun. He even ventured far enough to say Aurora is the reason his game experience was less than satisfactory. I am sorry I'd like to support you but I dont wanna see excuses