3. Aurave you're just taking everything I've said out of context. I never said clearing twice will mean fighting twice the amount of troops or that they'll magically grow an extra 2k pop. It's just another chance for the defender, in a defense skewed game, to defend again.
I never said you said that. That was my example of what it would take to make your argument valid, because having an extra chance to defend does not equal twice the units. The absurdity of what is needed to make your point correct is the basis of my rebuttal.
I took what you said, agreed with the fact you brought up about current servers, but showed how your projecting this to a new system was flawed and refuted it.
You had to of course clear a city first and that was sometimes difficult enough. As everyone knows, clearing a full pop defense city takes about 3x the amount of pop in offense units.
My experience has shown this to be pretty much the case as well. I said it before-I still agree with this.
Now.. you technically have to clear a city twice.
Once to get the revolt going and then once again to get your CS in successfully.
Since the game is skewed towards defense, this means that the attacker needs twice as many attacking troops as the defender.
You have already established the common knowledge that it takes 3x the pop space of offense to clear an equal defense. You use the word
now, along with the idea that the attacker needs twice as many troops as the defender. I specifically went out of my way to put this into context, using the previous post to correctly interpret this statement as follows-due to the revolt change, attackers will need to use twice as many units as previously. That would be 6x.
Anyways I'm done with this thread. I came on here to discuss why I think the new improvement wasn't really an improvement and it was simply a way for Inno to keep more of their account base.
Except you never discussed, only whined and put other downs for no reason. There was no discussion on your part, did you actually read my posts? A map it out step by step.
You're just being a plain idiot with that and I will not debate with idiots. Simply because I'm the one that's outspoken doesn't mean that I'm the only one. So have at it.. enjoy.. I'm done posting here. When you're ready to debate points and not demean others message me. I'll come back.
I clearly showed you started off the entire thread without bringing up any points, and just demeaning others. I then called you on it. You followed by holding a hypocritical double standard- I needed to debate your
non existent points and stop demeaning you. When you finally posted your thinking, something substantial that could be worked with, thought through, and debated, I did exactly that. I gave legitimate examples of why I thought you were wrong in proclaiming revolt would horribly unbalance city takeovers for the defender.
What do you do after this? Call me an idiot, and that you won't debate with idiots. It seems to me you can't debate anyone at all anyway. Then you call for me to once more debate the points you made and not demean you. That's exactly what I already did, debated your points.
I hardly think any of this matters anymore- The sneak implementation of a truly game changing mechanic has everyone's attention. I guess you can see the difference now, whining about a conquest based change that brings something different to the table compared to a completely unbalanced morale system that neuters an attacking army into thirds.