Nice Arch, Pulling out a conversation from A YEAR AGO, In which I acknowledge Absolutely NOTHING that I have not mentioned before..
And that is apparently proof that "I admired the concept of duel accouting".. Really?.
I said "not a bad idea" as in the concept of duel accounting is theoretically a good idea, The idea that a player could be active in two alliances is a decent idea and could be highly useful as they would have direct access to operational infomation. I could and would in principle say the same thing about Techo Terrorism and computer cracking as that could be highly profitable and useful to the user. Would that therefore mean that as I think the idea of infomation gathering and hacking is a good idea mean therefore that Iam a member of Annoymous?..... Apples and Oranges Arch.. Also just to set the scene for everyone this conversation between ourselves was during the time that Dan was in ZT. Now as noted what Iam accused of is a violation of Grep rules. Both of us will acknowledge that, Now clearly the punishment for duel account outweighs the risk as an offender has their account locked for good and cannot access the game on that connection. Plus as I noted even a few months into the game the odds of spawning in ZT waters was a slim percentage at best as noted by me in the coms. Since ZT at that point in the game controlled maybe three to four oceans?. If I did do what Iam accused of I would have to be firstly very lucky to evade detection as long as I apparently did and secondly very lucky to even spawn in ZT waters. As at that point in the game 27 oceans were occupied and we are talking about trying to spawn into three or four specific oceans which ZT owned? The odds of achieving those two alone are tiny..
Now I know about spawning and beginners protection and restarting because as is obvious when you look at my awards from other worlds, I have tried playing on other worlds too and as a result I therefore know that when you start on a world it is a random spawn but when you are rimmed you have more of an option on where you can respawn. Still Arch, This isnt evidence of me doing anything wrong as it can be and is explained through a perfectly rational means.
Occam's Razor loosely states that the hypothesis that requires the fewest assumptions is most likely to be true. What you are accusing me takes in principle a series of massive amounts of luck as well as numerous assumptions while my defence takes fewer assumptions. These assumptions that you are making cannot varifed and are foundationless in their makeup. While on the other hand it isnt a massive leap to assume that I can and did read up about the practice of respawning and restarting on the Grepo Wiki or that I was actually have had to restart on other worlds due to spawning in a bad location. What you are accusing me of violates Occum's Razor as I have demonstrated Arch.
Plus if you are going to post pictures of our coms at least be honest enough to post the whole thing rather than a chopped up version of that conversation. It is as I have told you before.... Quotemining.. Furthermore just to expand on the Nate thing, I have never denied that Nate played with an SIC and doubled as a player in ZT. But the problem for you is that Iam not Nate and Nate did that of his own accord and I consider it unfair to paint us all with that same brush as that is Nate's baggage, Not ours.. That is therefore not something you can hold over me or TD in my view.
Now onto the German thing, I have no german direct ancestry links to Germany as I can and have traced my family back to beyond the 1500s and there is no trace of direct German Ancestry there not that there is anything wrong with German ancestry or even being German of course . However my real sirname which I won't use here is actually Saxon in origin. Now since a large part of Northern Europe is decended in one from either Celtic or German/Nordic origin thanks to the Vikings, Saxons, Goths and etc. I therefore decided to embrace my ancestry to some extent to prove a point. Now I should note that I do not consider myself German as my more direct and recent ancestry is not German but as noted most of Europe is decended from German Ancestry in one form or another (thanks to the civilizations/tribes mentioned). So in the context "We" refering to Germany or the German people it isnt actually a factually innaccurate statement since as noted my real name is partly Saxon in origin. Secondly, The point as I have demonstrated does actually help to show the point I concluded because as noted I never said that I was actually german in the original quote and that is noticable in the fact that I see that you have not bothered to post a picture of my original quote but are instead highlighting a refrence to it..... I rest my case.....
Also Arch, Linking to a post which I have already addressed in the following post offers absolutely nothing to your claim.. I have already addressed this claim SO MANY TIMES it is getting tiresome. At this point you are seemingly like a creationist or flat earther.. Nothing is good enough and you will keep believing your garbage and pointing at these same bits of "evidence" regardless of what is presented to contradict them. You have nothing on me Archidiamedes now go away and stew in your own Paranoid bitterness... You are a pathetic joke.
Also the fact that you think you are being a thorn in my side is comical to me. You quit herm and ran for the hills rather than face an op from our apparently "ineffectual attackers".. Surely the best evidence for that (and it would have been great PnP for you) would have been to stand and defend our attacks as if we where so "ineffectual" that would have been your undeniable proof.... But alas you ran like a coward rather than face an attack because you knew just how full of it you actually are... Thank you for helping us to dismiss your own arguements.. You really are a joke Archi..
